Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34681793›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

MiR-106b-5p: A Master Regulator of Potential Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Aggressiveness and Prognosis.

Paula Lucía Farré, Rocío Belén Duca, Cintia Massillo, Guillermo Nicolás Dalton, Karen Daniela Graña, Kevin Gardner, Ezequiel Lacunza, Adriana De Siervi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. miRNAs in Cancer (Review of Literature).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paula Lucía FarréLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular y Nuevos Blancos Terapéuticos, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), CONICET, Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-3876-9061
Rocío Belén DucaLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular y Nuevos Blancos Terapéuticos, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), CONICET, Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina.
Cintia MassilloLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular y Nuevos Blancos Terapéuticos, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), CONICET, Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina.
Guillermo Nicolás DaltonLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular y Nuevos Blancos Terapéuticos, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), CONICET, Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina.
Karen Daniela GrañaLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular y Nuevos Blancos Terapéuticos, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), CONICET, Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina.
Kevin GardnerDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Ezequiel LacunzaCentro de Investigaciones Inmunológicas Básicas y Aplicadas (CINIBA), Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Buenos Aires B1900, Argentina.
Adriana De SierviLaboratorio de Oncología Molecular y Nuevos Blancos Terapéuticos, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME), CONICET, Buenos Aires C1428ADN, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · AR

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2014-324Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2015-1345Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2018-1304Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT START UP-2019-21Fundación Williams 2020Instituto Nacional del Cáncer INC 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BCa) is the leading cause of death by cancer in women worldwide. This disease is mainly stratified in four subtypes according to the presence of specific receptors, which is important for BCa aggressiveness, progression and prognosis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that have the capability to modulate several genes. Our aim was to identify a miRNA signature deregulated in preclinical and clinical BCa models for potential biomarker discovery that would be useful for BCa diagnosis and/or prognosis. We identified hsa-miR-21-5p and miR-106b-5p as up-regulated and hsa-miR-205-5p and miR-143-3p as down-regulated in BCa compared to normal breast or normal adjacent (NAT) tissues. We established 51 shared target genes between hsa-miR-21-5p and miR-106b-5p, which negatively correlated with the miRNA expression. Furthermore, we assessed the pathways in which these genes were involved and selected 12 that were associated with cancer and metabolism. Additionally,

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMicroRNAsNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisTumor Cells, CulturedBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN106 microRNA, humanaggressivenessbiomarkerbreast cancerprognosis

Identifiers

PMID34681793
PMCPMC8539154
OpenAlexW3206417088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.