Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34681594›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Protection of Teleost Fish against Infectious Diseases through Oral Administration of Vaccines: Update 2021.

Jarl Bøgwald, Roy A Dalmo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. TransgenicMarine drugs · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Levamisole Hydrochloride againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Why vaccines fail againstFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jarl BøgwaldNorwegian College of Fishery Science, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Muninbakken 21, N-9019 Tromsø, Norway.
Roy A DalmoNorwegian College of Fishery Science, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Muninbakken 21, N-9019 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6181-9859
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

The Research Council of Norway 301401The Research Council of Norway 325159UiT - the Arctic University of Norway Open Access Publication Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immersion and intraperitoneal injection are the two most common methods used for the vaccination of fish. Because both methods require that fish are handled and thereby stressed, oral administration of vaccines as feed supplements is desirable. In addition, in terms of revaccination (boosting) of adult fish held in net pens, oral administration of vaccines is probably the only feasible method to obtain proper protection against diseases over long periods of time. Oral vaccination is considered a suitable method for mass immunization of large and stress-sensitive fish populations. Moreover, oral vaccines may preferably induce mucosal immunity, which is especially important to fish. Experimental oral vaccine formulations include both non-encapsulated and encapsulated antigens, viruses and bacteria. To develop an effective oral vaccine, the desired antigens must be protected against the harsh environments in the stomach and gut so they can remain intact when they reach the lower gut/intestine where they normally are absorbed and transported to immune cells. The most commonly used encapsulation method is the use of alginate microspheres that can effectively deliver vaccines to the intestine without degradation. Other encapsulation methods include chitosan encapsulation, poly D,L-lactide-co-glycolic acid and liposome encapsulation. Only a few commercial oral vaccines are available on the market, including those against infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), Spring viremia carp virus (SVCV), infectious salmon anaemia virus (ISAV) and

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsFish DiseasesImmunity, MucosalParasitic Diseases, AnimalVaccines, DNAVaccines, SyntheticVibrio InfectionsVirus DiseasesVaccines, DNAVaccines, Syntheticfishmucosal immunityoral vaccinationteleost

Identifiers

PMID34681594
PMCPMC8535532
OpenAlexW3205065135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.