Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34681469›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Relationship between Acceptance of Insects as an Alternative to Meat and Willingness to Consume Insect-Based Food-A Study on a Representative Sample of the Polish Population.

Klaudia Modlinska, Dominika Adamczyk, Dominika Maison, Katarzyna Goncikowska, Wojciech Pisula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Consumers' Acceptability and Perception of Edible Insects as an Emerging Protein Source.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Klaudia ModlinskaInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Science, Jaracza 1, 00-378 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2161-9019
Dominika AdamczykFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Stawki 5/7, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0082-0271
Dominika MaisonFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Stawki 5/7, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna GoncikowskaInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Science, Jaracza 1, 00-378 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9763-3370
Wojciech PisulaInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Science, Jaracza 1, 00-378 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5777-0549

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2017/27/B/HS6/01197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their nutritional and ecological potential, insect-based food is rarely accepted by consumers. There may be a discrepancy between the consumers' understanding of the need to reduce meat consumption and their personal food preferences. Our goal was to investigate the relationship between the acceptance of insects as a meat substitute, the willingness to buy and consume insect-based food, and the underlying factors. The study was conducted on a representative sample of the Polish population, and as in previous studies, our results showed that men who are more familiar with entomophagy pay more attention to the environmental impact of their food choices, are convenience-orientated and are more willing to accept insects as a meat substitute. However, people with higher levels of food neophobia and disgust sensitivity and lower levels of variety-seeking tendency are less willing to consume insects. Our study showed that the acceptance of insects as an alternative to meat (general perspective) does not translate into a willingness to buy and eat them (individual perspective). Consumers who declare their acceptance of insects as a meat substitute might not be willing to purchase insects for their consumption.

Indexed as

consumer studiesdisgusteatingenvironmental concernsfood choicesfood neophobiainsects as foodsustainable meat alternativevariety-seeking

Identifiers

PMID34681469
PMCPMC8536127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.