Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34681217›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Implications of Antigen Selection on T Cell-Based Immunotherapy.

Faye A Camp, Jill E Slansky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Faye A CampDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0796-9346
Jill E SlanskyDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3820-1724

Funding

Functional Activation of Low Affinity TILsR01CA226879 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SLANSKY, JILL E · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many immunotherapies rely on CD8+ effector T cells to recognize and kill cognate tumor cells. These T cell-based immunotherapies include adoptive cell therapy, such as CAR T cells or transgenic TCR T cells, and anti-cancer vaccines which expand endogenous T cell populations. Tumor mutation burden and the choice of antigen are among the most important aspects of T cell-based immunotherapies. Here, we highlight various classes of cancer antigens, including self, neojunction-derived, human endogenous retrovirus (HERV)-derived, and somatic nucleotide variant (SNV)-derived antigens, and consider their utility in T cell-based immunotherapies. We further discuss the respective anti-tumor/anti-self-properties that influence both the degree of immunotolerance and potential off-target effects associated with each antigen class.

Indexed as

alternative splicing-derived neoepitopesHERV antigensneojunctionssingle nucleotide variantsT cell-based immunotherapiestumor-associated antigenstumor-specific antigens

Identifiers

PMID34681217
PMCPMC8537967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.