ReviewGenes2021
Using
Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Editorial: Protistan phagotrophy and the far-reaching implications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Teaching molecular genetics usingJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- Identification and bioinformatics analysis of cilia-associated gene families inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- A Review for the Special Issue onMicroorganisms · 2023Review
- The Tubulin Superfamily in Apicomplexan Parasites.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Retinal Degeneration Animal Models in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome and Related Ciliopathies.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023Review
- Structures and functions of cilia during vertebrate embryo development.Molecular reproduction and development · 2022Review
- Method for Stress Assessment of Endosymbiotic Algae inMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- PCD Genes-From Patients to Model Organisms and Back to Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.