Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34680715›Full record

ArticleInsects2021

First Population Study on Winter Breeding Monarch Butterflies,

David G James, Maria C Schaefer, Karen Krimmer Easton, Annie Carl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dramatic recent declines in the size of monarch butterfly (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David G JamesDepartment of Entomology, Washington State University, 24106 North Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0494-6392
Maria C Schaefer2558 Mardell Way, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.
Karen Krimmer Easton435 Marion Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Annie Carl2661 Waverley Street, Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The western North American monarch butterfly population assessed by counts of non-reproductive overwintering butterflies at coastal sites in California declined to less than 2000 in 2020/21. Simultaneously, reports of reproductive monarchs increased in San Francisco urban areas, perhaps representing a shift in overwintering strategy. To better understand monarch winter breeding in the Bay area, we studied adult and immature populations in Santa Clara County during January-June 2021. Adult monarchs were common with numbers ranging from 0.23-1.54/min during ~30 min weekly surveys at one site, with lowest numbers late April to mid-May. Eggs and larvae, primarily on ornamental milkweeds, were found on nearly all survey dates with lowest numbers mid-late April to mid-May. Levels of infection of adults by the parasite

Indexed as

migrationnon-reproductiveoverwintering strategyparasitereproduction

Identifiers

PMID34680715
PMCPMC8537757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.