Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34680610›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2021

Styrene Maleic Acid Copolymer-Based Micellar Formation of Temoporfin (SMA@ mTHPC) Behaves as A Nanoprobe for Tumor-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy with A Superior Safety.

Jun Fang, Shanghui Gao, Rayhanul Islam, Hinata Nema, Rina Yanagibashi, Niho Yoneda, Natsumi Watanabe, Yuki Yasuda, Naoki Nuita, Jian-Rong Zhou and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Poly(styrene-ACS omega · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Photodynamic Therapy.Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
  6. Poly(styrene-Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun FangFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.
Shanghui GaoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.
Rayhanul IslamFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8621-2386
Hinata NemaFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.
Rina YanagibashiFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.
Niho YonedaFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.
Natsumi WatanabeFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.
Yuki YasudaFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.
Naoki NuitaFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.
Jian-Rong ZhouFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.
Kazumi YokomizoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, Ikeda 4-22-1, Kumamoto 860-0082, Japan.
Sojo University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16K08217, 19K07743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor-targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT) using polymeric photosensitizers is a promising anticancer therapeutic strategy. Previously, we developed several polymeric nanoprobes for PDT using different polymers and PDT agents. In the study, we synthesized a styrene maleic acid copolymer (SMA) micelle encapsulating temoporfin (mTHPC) that is a clinically used PDT drug, SMA@mTHPC, with a hydrodynamic size of 98 nm, which showed high water solubility. SMA@mTHPC maintained stable micelle formation in physiological aqueous solutions including serum; however, the micelles could be disrupted in the presence of detergent (e.g., Tween 20) as well as lecithin, the major component of cell membrane, suggesting micelles will be destroyed and free mTHPC will be released during intracellular uptake. SMA@mTHPC showed a pH-dependent release profile, for which a constant release of ≈20% per day was found at pH 7.4, and much more release occurred at acidic pH (e.g., 6.5, 5.5), suggesting extensive release of free mTHPC could occur in the weak acidic environment of a tumor and further during internalization into tumor cells. In vitro cytotoxicity assay showed a lower cytotoxicity of SMA@mTHPC than free mTHPC; however, similar in vivo antitumor effects were observed by both SMA@mTHPC and free THPC. More importantly, severe side effects (e.g., body weight loss, death of the mice) were found during free mTHPC treatment, whereas no apparent side effects were observed for SMA@mTHPC. The superior safety profile of SMA@mTHPC was mostly due to its micelle formation and the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect-based tumor accumulation, as well as the tumor environment-responsive release properties. These findings suggested SMA@mTHPC may become a good candidate drug for targeted PDT with high safety.

Indexed as

EPR effectPDT nanoprobepolymeric micellestemoporfintumor targeting

Identifiers

PMID34680610
PMCPMC8533298
OpenAlexW3207400018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.