Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34680512›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2021

Protein Unfolding: Denaturant vs. Force.

Colleen Kelly, Matthew J Gage

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Taurine Stabilizing Effect on Lysozyme.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colleen KellyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.
Matthew J GageDepartment of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.
University of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

Exploring the role of pH in protein conformational change and muscle elasticityR15GM132840 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI GAGE, MATTHEW J · 2019 to 2019
$457k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM132840NIH HHS R15GM132840-01W. M. Keck Foundation Awarded 2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While protein refolding has been studied for over 50 years since the pioneering work of Christian Anfinsen, there have been a limited number of studies correlating results between chemical, thermal, and mechanical unfolding. The limited knowledge of the relationship between these processes makes it challenging to compare results between studies if different refolding methods were applied. Our current work compares the energetic barriers and folding rates derived from chemical, thermal, and mechanical experiments using an immunoglobulin-like domain from the muscle protein titin as a model system. This domain, I83, has high solubility and low stability relative to other Ig domains in titin, though its stability can be modulated by calcium. Our experiments demonstrated that the free energy of refolding was equivalent with all three techniques, but the refolding rates exhibited differences, with mechanical refolding having slightly faster rates. This suggests that results from equilibrium-based measurements can be compared directly but care should be given comparing refolding kinetics derived from refolding experiments that used different unfolding methods.

Indexed as

chemical denaturationimmunoglobulin domainmagnetic tweezersprotein refoldingthermal denaturationtitin

Identifiers

PMID34680512
PMCPMC8533514
OpenAlexW3202371435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.