Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34680376›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Natural History and Treatment Strategies of Advanced PEComas: A Systematic Review.

Agathe Bourgmayer, Simon Nannini, Paul Bonjean, Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz, Gabriel G Malouf, Justine Gantzer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Agathe BourgmayerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Strasbourg-Europe Cancer Institute (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France.
Simon NanniniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Strasbourg-Europe Cancer Institute (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France.
Paul BonjeanDepartment of Clinical Research and Pharmacology Innovation Unit, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Hôpital Nord, 42270 Saint-Priest en Jarez, France.
Jean-Emmanuel KurtzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Strasbourg-Europe Cancer Institute (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France.
Gabriel G MaloufDepartment of Medical Oncology, Strasbourg-Europe Cancer Institute (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France.
Justine GantzerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Strasbourg-Europe Cancer Institute (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France.
Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FRInserm · FRHôpital Nord · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PEComas is a family of rare mesenchymal tumors. This systematic review aims to better understand the natural history of advanced PEComas. After a search on the PubMed database and main oncology meeting libraries according to the PRISMA guidelines, 88 articles reported in the English literature were included. Data on clinical and histological features, treatments and outcomes were collected. To identify risk factors, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Seven cohorts of patients and 124 individual patients were identified. Focusing on case reports, most patients were metastatic, and the median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 60 months (95%CI 33; NA). Risk factors significantly associated with OS in the multivariate analysis were the presence of metastasis at diagnosis (HR: 2.59, 95%CI 1.06; 6.33,

Indexed as

locally advancedmetastaticoutcomesPEComarisk factors

Identifiers

PMID34680376
PMCPMC8533842
OpenAlexW3205423686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.