Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34680374›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Characterization of Microtubule Destabilizing Drugs: A Quantitative Cell-Based Assay That Bridges the Gap between Tubulin Based- and Cytotoxicity Assays.

Marie-Catherine Laisne, Sophie Michallet, Laurence Lafanechère

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HDAC6 inhibition reducesInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Piperazine derivatives as anticancer agents: a medicinal chemistry review of structure, mechanism, and clinical translation.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Phenotypic Screening of HPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie-Catherine LaisneInstitute for Advanced Biosciences, Team Cytoskeletal Dynamics and Nuclear Functions, INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Sophie MichalletInstitute for Advanced Biosciences, Team Cytoskeletal Dynamics and Nuclear Functions, INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Laurence LafanechèreInstitute for Advanced Biosciences, Team Cytoskeletal Dynamics and Nuclear Functions, INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7902-7630
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique programme prématuration 2019Ligue Contre le Cancer Comité de l'Isère
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Microtubule depolymerizing agents (MDAs) are commonly used for cancer treatment. However, the therapeutic use of such microtubule inhibitors is limited by their toxicity and the emergence of resistance. Thus, there is still a sustained effort to develop new MDAs. During the characterization of such agents, mainly through in vitro analyses using purified tubulin and cytotoxicity assays, quantitative comparisons are mandatory. The relationship between the effect of the drugs on purified tubulin and on cell viability are not always direct. (2) Methods: We have recently developed a cell-based assay that quantifies the cellular microtubule content. In this study, we have conducted a systematic comparative analysis of the effect of four well-characterized MDAs on the kinetics of in vitro tubulin assembly, on the cellular microtubule content (using our recently developed assay) and on cell viability. (3) Conclusions: These assays gave complementary results. Additionally, we found that the drugs' effect on in vitro tubulin polymerization is not completely predictive of their relative cytotoxicity. Their effect on the cellular microtubule content, however, is closely related to their effect on cell viability. In conclusion, the assay we have recently developed can bridge the gap between in vitro tubulin assays and cell viability assays.

Indexed as

cancer therapycell-based assaydrug discoverymicrotubules

Identifiers

PMID34680374
PMCPMC8533752
OpenAlexW3206478475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.