Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34680258›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Conventional Colorectal Adenocarcinomas: Incidental Finding or Prognostic Biomarker?

Björn Konukiewitz, Atsuko Kasajima, Maxime Schmitt, Kristina Schwamborn, Tanja Groll, Felix Schicktanz, Claire Delbridge, Lisa Marie Schütze, Dirk Wilhelm, Corinna Lang and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Björn KonukiewitzDepartment of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Atsuko KasajimaDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1130-1744
Maxime SchmittDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Kristina SchwambornDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Tanja GrollDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9049-9145
Felix SchicktanzDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Claire DelbridgeDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Lisa Marie SchützeDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Dirk WilhelmDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Corinna LangDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Sebastian LangeII Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0406-1401
Sebastian FoerschDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Paul JankDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, 35403 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7076-0476
Katja SteigerDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-5433
Alexander von WerderII Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Carsten DenkertDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, 35403 Marburg, Germany.
Wilko WeichertDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Günter KlöppelDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Moritz JesinghausDepartment of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DETUM Klinikum · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) are clinically highly aggressive neoplasms. MANECs are composed of variable adenocarcinoma components combined with morphologically distinct neuroendocrine carcinoma components, which are confirmed by synaptophysin immunohistochemistry, the gold standard marker of a neuroendocrine differentiation. However, the biological behavior of adenocarcinomas that express synaptophysin but do not show a typical neuroendocrine morphology remains unclear.

methodsWe investigated synaptophysin expression in 1002 conventional colorectal adenocarcinomas and correlated the results with clinicopathological characteristics and patient survival and compared the survival characteristics of synaptophysin expression groups to MANECs.

resultsSynaptophysin expression in conventional colorectal adenocarcinomas was associated with a shortened disease-free survival (

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that synaptophysin expression in conventional colorectal adenocarcinomas, in contrast to MANECs, is not associated with a significantly poorer clinical outcome when compared to adenocarcinomas without synaptophysin expression. Furthermore, our data suggest that conventional adenocarcinomas with a diffuse synaptophysin expression should not be classified as MANECs, also strongly arguing that synaptophysin testing should be reserved for carcinomas with an H&E morphology suggestive of a neuroendocrine differentiation.

Indexed as

colorectal adenocarcinomasMANECneuroendocrine differentiation

Identifiers

PMID34680258
PMCPMC8533893
OpenAlexW3205214547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.