Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34680169›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2021

Automated Fiber Diameter and Porosity Measurements of Plasma Clots in Scanning Electron Microscopy Images.

Ali Daraei, Marlien Pieters, Stephen R Baker, Zelda de Lange-Loots, Aleksander Siniarski, Rustem I Litvinov, Caroline S B Veen, Moniek P M de Maat, John W Weisel, Robert A S Ariëns and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Fibrin as a Versatile Fibrous Biopolymer.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ali DaraeiDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA.
Marlien PietersCenter of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2849-6370
Stephen R BakerDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3147-4925
Zelda de Lange-LootsCenter of Excellence for Nutrition (CEN), Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa.
Aleksander SiniarskiDepartment of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-202 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7493-3626
Rustem I LitvinovDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0643-1496
Caroline S B VeenDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Moniek P M de MaatDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7749-334X
John W WeiselDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Robert A S AriënsLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS16 8FX, UK.
Martin GutholdDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4177-6115

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/18/11/34036NIH HHS 1R15HL148842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) is a powerful, high-resolution imaging technique widely used to analyze the structure of fibrin networks. Currently, structural features, such as fiber diameter, length, density, and porosity, are mostly analyzed manually, which is tedious and may introduce user bias. A reliable, automated structural image analysis method would mitigate these drawbacks. We evaluated the performance of DiameterJ (an ImageJ plug-in) for analyzing fibrin fiber diameter by comparing automated DiameterJ outputs with manual diameter measurements in four SEM data sets with different imaging parameters. We also investigated correlations between biophysical fibrin clot properties and diameter, and between clot permeability and DiameterJ-determined clot porosity. Several of the 24 DiameterJ algorithms returned diameter values that highly correlated with and closely matched the values of the manual measurements. However, optimal performance was dependent on the pixel size of the images-best results were obtained for images with a pixel size of 8-10 nm (13-16 pixels/fiber). Larger or smaller pixels resulted in an over- or underestimation of diameter values, respectively. The correlation between clot permeability and DiameterJ-determined clot porosity was modest, likely because it is difficult to establish the correct image depth of field in this analysis. In conclusion, several DiameterJ algorithms (M6, M5, T3) perform well for diameter determination from SEM images, given the appropriate imaging conditions (13-16 pixels/fiber). Determining fibrin clot porosity via DiameterJ is challenging.

Indexed as

AdultBlood CoagulationFemaleFibrinHemorrhageHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPlasmaPorosityPregnancyThrombosisFibrinautomated analysisdiameterDiameterJfibrin fibersplasma clotsporosityscanning electron microscopystructure

Identifiers

PMID34680169
PMCPMC8533744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.