Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679992›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Sheep.

Romane Zufferey, Adrian Minnig, Beat Thomann, Sibylle Zwygart, Nina Keil, Gertraud Schüpbach, Raymond Miserez, Patrik Zanolari, Dimitri Stucki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comprehensive evaluation of dairy ewe welfare in Algerian intensive farms using the BIENE protocol.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2026
    Article
  5. The Effect of Environment and Husbandry Practices on Sheep Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review of Rat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Romane ZuffereyClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1190-6812
Adrian MinnigClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Beat ThomannVetsuisse-Faculty, Veterinary Public Health Institute, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8956-2231
Sibylle ZwygartClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Nina KeilCentre for Proper Housing of Ruminants and Pigs, Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Agroscope, 8356 Ettenhausen, Switzerland.
Gertraud SchüpbachVetsuisse-Faculty, Veterinary Public Health Institute, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Raymond MiserezConsulting and Health Service for Small Ruminants, 3362 Niederönz, Switzerland.
Patrik ZanolariClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-2487
Dimitri StuckiClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office 1.18.14TGFederal Office for Agriculture 1.18.14TG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value society assigns to animal welfare in agricultural productions is increasing, resulting in ever-enhancing methods to assess the well-being of farm animals. The aim of this study was to review the scientific literature to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on welfare assessments for sheep and to extract animal-based welfare indicators as well as welfare protocols with animal-based indicators. By title and abstract screening, we identified five protocols and 53 potential indicators from 55 references. Three out of the five protocols include animal-based as well as resource-based indicators. All of them were assessed as being practicable on-farm but lacking reliability. Some of the single indicators are endorsed by the literature and widely used in the field like assessment of behaviour, lameness or body condition score. Others (e.g., Faffa Malan Chart FAMACHA©, dag score or pain assessment) are regularly mentioned in the literature, but their reliability and usefulness are still subject of discussion. Several indicators, such as pruritic behaviour, eye condition, lying time or tooth loss are relatively new in the literature and still lack evidence for their validity and usefulness. This literature review serves as a starting point for the development of valid and practicable welfare protocols for sheep.

Indexed as

animal-basedassessmentindicatorson-farmprotocolssheepsmall ruminantswelfare

Identifiers

PMID34679992
PMCPMC8532706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.