Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679925›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Horse Jumping and Dressage Training Activity Detection Using Accelerometer Data.

Anniek Eerdekens, Margot Deruyck, Jaron Fontaine, Bert Damiaans, Luc Martens, Eli De Poorter, Jan Govaere, David Plets, Wout Joseph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Detecting Equine Gaits Through Rider-Worn Accelerometers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recent Advances in Smart Farming.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anniek EerdekensWAVES-IMEC, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9544-4904
Margot DeruyckWAVES-IMEC, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0816-6465
Jaron FontaineIDLab-IMEC, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5942-9440
Bert DamiaansVETMED, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7393-4718
Luc MartensWAVES-IMEC, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Eli De PoorterIDLab-IMEC, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0214-5751
Jan GovaereVETMED, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
David PletsWAVES-IMEC, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8879-5076
Wout JosephWAVES-IMEC, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-IMEC, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8807-0673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Equine training activity detection will help to track and enhance the performance and fitness level of riders and their horses. Currently, the equestrian world is eager for a simple solution that goes beyond detecting basic gaits, yet current technologies fall short on the level of user friendliness and detection of main horse training activities. To this end, we collected leg accelerometer data of 14 well-trained horses during jumping and dressage trainings. For the first time, 6 jumping training and 25 advanced horse dressage activities are classified using specifically developed models based on a neural network. A jumping training could be classified with a high accuracy of 100 %, while a dressage training could be classified with an accuracy of 96.29%. Assigning the dressage movements to 11, 6 or 4 superclasses results in higher accuracies of 98.87%, 99.10% and 100%, respectively. Furthermore, during dressage training, the side of movement could be identified with an accuracy of 97.08%. In addition, a velocity estimation model was developed based on the measured velocities of seven horses performing the collected, working, and extended gaits during a dressage training. For the walk, trot, and canter paces, the velocities could be estimated accurately with a low root mean square error of 0.07 m/s, 0.14 m/s, and 0.42 m/s, respectively.

Indexed as

accelerometeractivity recognitionCNNdressagemachine learningneural networkshow jumping

Identifiers

PMID34679925
PMCPMC8532712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.