Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679821›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Effects of Different Fermented Feeds on Production Performance, Cecal Microorganisms, and Intestinal Immunity of Laying Hens.

Lijuan Guo, Jing Lv, Yinglu Liu, Hui Ma, Bingxu Chen, Keyang Hao, Jia Feng, Yuna Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early-Phase Response of Broiler Breeders to 25-Hydroxyvitamin DAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Regulatory Effects of the ProbioticThe journal of poultry science · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lijuan GuoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Jing LvCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Yinglu LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Hui MaCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Bingxu ChenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Keyang HaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Jia FengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Yuna MinCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.

Funding

China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA CARS-40-S20Province Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi 2021NY-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different compound probiotics on the performance, cecal microflora, and intestinal immunity of laying hens. A total of 270 Jing Fen No.6 (22-week-old) were randomly divided into 3 groups: basal diet (CON); basal diet supplemented with 6% fermented feed A by

Indexed as

cecal microbiomesfermented feedlayerproduction performance

Identifiers

PMID34679821
PMCPMC8532698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.