Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679808›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

A Systematic Review of Musculoskeletal Mobilization and Manipulation Techniques Used in Veterinary Medicine.

Kevin K Haussler, Amie L Hesbach, Laura Romano, Lesley Goff, Anna Bergh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Chiropractic Treatment of Dairy Cows.Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kevin K HausslerEquine Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80535, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3860-0282
Amie L HesbachEmpowerPhysio, 2585CW The Hague, The Netherlands.
Laura RomanoVCA Canada Central Victoria Veterinary Hospital, Victoria, BC V8X 2R3, Canada.
Lesley GoffSchool of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
Anna BerghDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5567-6249

Funding

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU.ua.2020.4.2-3148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobilization and manipulation techniques are often used in small animal and equine practice; however, questions remain concerning indications, dosing and efficacy. A bibliographic search was performed to identify peer-reviewed publications from 1980 to 2020 that evaluated the clinical effects of musculoskeletal mobilization and manipulation techniques in dogs, cats and horses. The search strategy identified 883 papers for review. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The clinical indications, dosages, outcome parameters, and reported efficacy within each publication were recorded and categorized for comparison with scientific quality assessed according to a standardized grading system. Fourteen articles were included in this systematic review of which 13 were equine and one was a canine study. Seven of these were cohort studies and seven were randomized controlled clinical trials. The canine study involved carpal immobilization-remobilization and all equine studies focused on the effects of passive mobilization (

Indexed as

chiropracticdoghorsemanipulationmanual therapiesmobilizationmusculoskeletalosteopathy

Identifiers

PMID34679808
PMCPMC8532674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.