Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679798›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Free Faecal Water: Analysis of Horse Faecal Microbiota and the Impact of Faecal Microbial Transplantation on Symptom Severity.

Louise Laustsen, Joan E Edwards, Gerben D A Hermes, Nanna Lúthersson, David A van Doorn, Supattra Okrathok, Theresa J Kujawa, Hauke Smidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Louise LaustsenDepartment of Veterinary Education, Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Neston CH64 7TE, UK.
Joan E EdwardsLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0759-633X
Gerben D A HermesLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4314-9553
Nanna LútherssonHestedoktoren, 4360 Kirke Eskilstrup, Denmark.
David A van DoornDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Equine Health, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Supattra OkrathokLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Theresa J KujawaDepartment Population Health Sciences, Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hauke SmidtLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6138-5026
Wageningen University & Research · NLUtrecht University · NLSuranaree University of Technology · THUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free faecal water (FFW) in equines results in pollution of the hindquarters and tail and can also involve clinical signs. Though the cause of FFW is unknown, it was hypothesized that it may involve the gut microbiota. This hypothesis was addressed as follows. First, the faecal prokaryotic community composition of horses suffering from FFW relative to healthy controls (

Indexed as

archaeabacteriaequinefaecal water syndromefaecesfree faecal liquidhindgutprokaryote

Identifiers

PMID34679798
PMCPMC8533009
OpenAlexW3203570496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.