ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Brain Cancer Prediction Based on Novel Interpretable Ensemble Gene Selection Algorithm and Classifier.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of deep learning and omics data in transforming precision therapy for brain cancer.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- DeepGenMon: A Novel Framework for Monkeypox Classification Integrating Lightweight Attention-Based Deep Learning and a Genetic Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From genetic data to kinship clarity: employing machine learning for detecting incestuous relations.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Enhancing machine learning performance in cardiac surgery ICU: Hyperparameter optimization with metaheuristic algorithm.PloS one · 2025Article
- Multiconvolutional Transfer Learning for 3D Brain Tumor Magnetic Resonance Images.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Real-world data to build explainable trustworthy artificial intelligence models for prediction of immunotherapy efficacy in NSCLC patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growth of abnormal cells in the brain causes human brain tumors. Identifying the type of tumor is crucial for the prognosis and treatment of the patient. Data from cancer microarrays typically include fewer samples with many gene expression levels as features, reflecting the curse of dimensionality and making classifying data from microarrays challenging. In most of the examined studies, cancer classification (Malignant and benign) accuracy was examined without disclosing biological information related to the classification process. A new approach was proposed to bridge the gap between cancer classification and the interpretation of the biological studies of the genes implicated in cancer. This study aims to develop a new hybrid model for cancer classification (by using feature selection mRMRe as a key step to improve the performance of classification methods and a distributed hyperparameter optimization for gradient boosting ensemble methods). To evaluate the proposed method, NB, RF, and SVM classifiers have been chosen. In terms of the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity, the optimized CatBoost classifier performed better than the optimized XGBoost in cross-validation 5, 6, 8, and 10. With an accuracy of 0.91±0.12, the optimized CatBoost classifier is more accurate than the CatBoost classifier without optimization, which is 0.81± 0.24. By using hybrid algorithms, SVM, RF, and NB automatically become more accurate. Furthermore, in terms of accuracy, SVM and RF (0.97±0.08) achieve equivalent and higher classification accuracy than NB (0.91±0.12). The findings of relevant biomedical studies confirm the findings of the selected genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.