Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679634›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Brain Cancer Prediction Based on Novel Interpretable Ensemble Gene Selection Algorithm and Classifier.

Abdulqader M Almars, Majed Alwateer, Mohammed Qaraad, Souad Amjad, Hanaa Fathi, Ayda K Kelany, Nazar K Hussein, Mostafa Elhosseini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abdulqader M AlmarsCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Taibah University, Yanbu 46411, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6822-1008
Majed AlwateerCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Taibah University, Yanbu 46411, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6430-9806
Mohammed QaraadDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tetouan 93000, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0002-9513-0355
Souad AmjadDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tetouan 93000, Morocco.
Hanaa FathiMath and Computer Science Department, Menoufia University, Menoufia 32511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-1063-398X
Ayda K KelanyDepartment of Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Cairo 12613, Egypt.
Nazar K HusseinDepartment of Mathematics, College of Computer Sciences and Mathematics, Tikrit University, Tikrit 34001, Iraq.
Mostafa ElhosseiniCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Taibah University, Yanbu 46411, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1259-6193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth of abnormal cells in the brain causes human brain tumors. Identifying the type of tumor is crucial for the prognosis and treatment of the patient. Data from cancer microarrays typically include fewer samples with many gene expression levels as features, reflecting the curse of dimensionality and making classifying data from microarrays challenging. In most of the examined studies, cancer classification (Malignant and benign) accuracy was examined without disclosing biological information related to the classification process. A new approach was proposed to bridge the gap between cancer classification and the interpretation of the biological studies of the genes implicated in cancer. This study aims to develop a new hybrid model for cancer classification (by using feature selection mRMRe as a key step to improve the performance of classification methods and a distributed hyperparameter optimization for gradient boosting ensemble methods). To evaluate the proposed method, NB, RF, and SVM classifiers have been chosen. In terms of the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity, the optimized CatBoost classifier performed better than the optimized XGBoost in cross-validation 5, 6, 8, and 10. With an accuracy of 0.91±0.12, the optimized CatBoost classifier is more accurate than the CatBoost classifier without optimization, which is 0.81± 0.24. By using hybrid algorithms, SVM, RF, and NB automatically become more accurate. Furthermore, in terms of accuracy, SVM and RF (0.97±0.08) achieve equivalent and higher classification accuracy than NB (0.91±0.12). The findings of relevant biomedical studies confirm the findings of the selected genes.

Indexed as

brain cancerclassificationensemble methodsfeature selectiongene expression datagene selectionhyperparameter optimization

Identifiers

PMID34679634
PMCPMC8535043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.