Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679614›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Survival Guide for the Rapid Transition to a Fully Digital Workflow: The "Caltagirone Example".

Filippo Fraggetta, Alessandro Caputo, Rosa Guglielmino, Maria Giovanna Pellegrino, Giampaolo Runza, Vincenzo L'Imperio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Digital transformation of pathology - the European Society of Pathology expert opinion paper.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Digital pathology structure and deployment in Veneto: a proof-of-concept study.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Cutting-edge technology and automation in the pathology laboratory.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Filippo FraggettaPathology Unit, ASP Catania, "Gravina" Hospital, 95041 Caltagirone, Italy.
Alessandro CaputoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 84121 Salerno, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5139-3869
Rosa GuglielminoPathology Unit, ASP Catania, "Gravina" Hospital, 95041 Caltagirone, Italy.
Maria Giovanna PellegrinoHealth Care Management Unit, ASP Catania, "Gravina" Hospital, 95041 Caltagirone, Italy.
Giampaolo RunzaSuperintendency Unit, ASP Catania, "Gravina" Hospital, 95041 Caltagirone, Italy.
Vincenzo L'ImperioPathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, ASST Monza, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-2998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital pathology for the routine assessment of cases for primary diagnosis has been implemented by few laboratories worldwide. The Gravina Hospital in Caltagirone (Sicily, Italy), which collects cases from 7 different hospitals distributed in the Catania area, converted the entire workflow to digital starting from 2019. Before the transition, the Caltagirone pathology laboratory was characterized by a non-tracked workflow, based on paper requests, hand-written blocks and slides, as well as manual assembling and delivering of the cases and glass slides to the pathologists. Moreover, the arrangement of the spaces and offices in the department was illogical and under-productive for the linearity of the workflow. For these reasons, an adequate 2D barcode system for tracking purposes, the redistribution of the spaces inside the laboratory and the implementation of the whole-slide imaging (WSI) technology based on a laboratory information system (LIS)-centric approach were adopted as a needed prerequisite to switch to a digital workflow. The adoption of a dedicated connection for transfer of clinical and administrative data between different software and interfaces using an internationally recognised standard (Health Level 7, HL7) in the pathology department further facilitated the transition, helping in the integration of the LIS with WSI scanners. As per previous reports, the components and devices chosen for the pathologists' workstations did not significantly impact on the WSI-based reporting phase in primary histological diagnosis. An analysis of all the steps of this transition has been made retrospectively to provide a useful "handy" guide to lead the digital transition of "analog", non-tracked pathology laboratories following the experience of the Caltagirone pathology department. Following the step-by-step instructions, the implementation of a paperless routine with more standardized and safe processes, the possibility to manage the priority of the cases and to implement artificial intelligence (AI) tools are no more an utopia for every "analog" pathology department.

Indexed as

2D-barcodedigital pathologyLISprimary diagnosisWSI

Identifiers

PMID34679614
PMCPMC8534326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.