ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Open Globe Injuries: Classifications and Prognostic Factors for Functional Outcome.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computed tomography accuracy and features in detecting open globe injuries in patients with ocular trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Article
- External Long-Term Validation of the Retinal Detachment After Open Globe Injury (RD-OGI) Score in a Large Single-Center Cohort: A Retrospective Study with Up to Two Years of Follow-Up.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Demographic characteristics and visual prognosis of open globe ınjuries in an ındustrialized region of Turkey, east Thrace.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Should Chronic Subretinal Hemorrhage Be Treated Surgically?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Open globe injuries in a croatian cohort: characteristics and prognostic value of the ocular trauma score in predicting the final visual outcome.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors, Including Workers' Compensation, as Predictors of Monocular Blindness After Open Globe Injuries.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Management of scleral tears with concurrent intraocular foreign bodies and factors affecting outcomes.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of open globe injuries in Southwest China.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Effect of time to operative repair within twenty-four hours on visual acuity outcomes for open globe injuries.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Open Globe Injuries: Review of Evaluation, Management, and Surgical Pearls.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Article
- Impact of Social Vulnerability Index and Distance to Tertiary Ocular Emergency Department in Patients Presenting with Open Globe Injury.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explored epidemiology and evaluation of posterior segment involvement as prognostic factors for functional outcome of patients with open globe injuries. A retrospective analysis of 151 patients with open globe injuries was conducted. Pre- and postoperative-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), epidemiologic data, classification of the injuries including the ocular trauma score (OTS), performed surgeries, intraocular pressure (IOP) and correlation analyses between OTS and postoperative CDVA were obtained. A total of 147 eyes were included in the study. Mean age was 42.9 ± 22.2 years, 78.2% were male, and 36.7% of injuries occurred in the workplace. Thirty-eight patients (25.9%) had intraocular foreign bodies. Concerning injury location, 51.7% of the injuries were located in zone I (cornea, corneoscleral limbus), 15.0% in zone II (up to 5 mm posterior the sclerocorneal limbus) and 32.0% in zone III (posterior of zone 2). Affected structures were eyelids (17.7%), cornea (74.8%), iris (63.9%), lens (56.5%), sclera (48.3%), retina (47.6%) and optic nerve (19.7%). Mean preoperative CDVA was 1.304 ± 0.794 logMAR and 1.289 ± 0.729 logMAR postoperatively (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.