ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
An Automatic Bleeding-Rank System for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Surgery Videos Using Machine Learning.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current utility of artificial intelligence in benign prostate surgery: a review of literature on behalf of the EAU section of endourology.World journal of urology · 2025Review
- Construction of a nomogram to predict urethral stricture after transurethral resection of the prostate: A retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Current advances in the use of artificial intelligence in predicting and managing urological complications.International urology and nephrology · 2024Review
- Automated Capture of Intraoperative Adverse Events Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Simple and Convenient Method for Assessing the Severity of Bleeding during Endoscopic Prostate Surgery and the Relationships between Its Corresponding Surgical Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the main cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging males. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) surgery is performed by a cystoscope passing through the urethra and scraping off the prostrate piece by piece through a cutting loop. Although TURP is a minimally invasive procedure, bleeding is still the most common complication. Therefore, the evaluation, monitoring, and prevention of interop bleeding during TURP are very important issues. The main idea of this study is to rank bleeding levels during TURP surgery from videos. Generally, to judge bleeding level by human eyes from surgery videos is a difficult task, which requires sufficient experienced urologists. In this study, machine learning-based ranking algorithms are proposed to efficiently evaluate the ranking of blood levels. Based on the visual clarity of the surgical field, the four ranking of blood levels, including score 0: excellent; score 1: acceptable; score 2: slightly bad; and 3: bad, were identified by urologists who have sufficient experience in TURP surgery. The results of extensive experiments show that the revised accuracy can achieve 90, 89, 90, and 91%, respectively. Particularly, the results reveal that the proposed methods were capable of classifying the ranking of bleeding level accurately and efficiently reducing the burden of urologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.