Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679458›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Development and Efficacy of Lateral Flow Point-of-Care Testing Devices for Rapid and Mass COVID-19 Diagnosis by the Detections of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen and Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies.

Wen-Yeh Hsieh, Cheng-Han Lin, Tzu-Ching Lin, Chao-Hsu Lin, Hui-Fang Chang, Chin-Hung Tsai, Hsi-Tien Wu, Chih-Sheng Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Recent developments in the use of gold and silver nanoparticles in biomedicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Recent Progress on Rapid Lateral Flow Assay-Based Early Diagnosis of COVID-19.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Yeh HsiehDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Chest Medicine, Hsinchu Mackay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu 30068, Taiwan.
Cheng-Han LinDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30068, Taiwan.
Tzu-Ching LinDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Chao-Hsu LinDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30068, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5591-0907
Hui-Fang ChangDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30068, Taiwan.
Chin-Hung TsaiDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30068, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6154-4541
Hsi-Tien WuDepartment of BioAgricultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, National Chiayi University, Chiayi 60004, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8527-9597
Chih-Sheng LinDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30068, Taiwan.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TWNational Chiayi University · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is an ongoing global pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 2020-2021. COVID-19 is becoming one of the most fatal pandemics in history and brings a huge challenge to the global healthcare system. Opportune detection, confinement, and early treatment of infected cases present the first step in combating COVID-19. Diagnosis via viral nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) is frequently employed and considered the standard procedure. However, with an increasing urge for point-of-care tests, rapid and cheaper immunoassays are widely utilized, such as lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), which can be used for rapid, early, and large-scale detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this narrative review, the principle and technique of LFIA applied in COVID-19 antigen and antibody detection are introduced. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the commercial LFIA tests are outlined and compared. Generally, LFIA antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 are less sensitive than viral NAATs, the "gold standard" for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis. However, antigen tests can be used for rapid and mass testing in high-risk congregate housing to quickly identify people with COVID-19, implementing infection prevention and control measures, thus preventing transmission. LFIA anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests, IgM and/or IgG, known as serology tests, are used for identification if a person has previously been exposed to the virus or vaccine immunization. Notably, advanced techniques, such as LFT-based CRISPR-Cas9 and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), have added new dimensions to the COVID-19 diagnosis and are also discussed in this review.

Indexed as

antibodiesantigenCOVID-19lateral flow immunoassaylateral flow testSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34679458
PMCPMC8534532
OpenAlexW3203697720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.