ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
An Image-Based Workflow for Objective Vessel Wall Enhancement Quantification in Intracranial Aneurysms.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local pressure as a dominant hemodynamic driver of wall enhancement in anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a facet-level computational fluid dynamics and vessel wall imaging analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Voxel-Wise Quantification and Multi-planar Visualization of Plaque Contrast Enhancement in Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of radiogenomics for risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms: a pilot study.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Radiogenomics for Risk Stratification of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Pilot Study.Research square · 2025Article
- There Is Poor Agreement between the Subjective and Quantitative Adjudication of Aneurysm Wall Enhancement.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Statins may Decrease Aneurysm wall Enhancement of Unruptured Fusiform Intracranial Aneurysms: A high-resolution 3T MRI Study.Translational stroke research · 2024Article
- Radiomics Features in Contrast-Enhanced and Nonenhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Images Are Associated With High Intracranial Aneurysmal Risk.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- 3D aneurysm wall enhancement is associated with symptomatic presentation.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2023Article
- Tectonic infarct analysis: A computational tool for automated whole-brain infarct analysis from TTC-stained tissue.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Aneurysm risk metrics and hemodynamics are associated with greater vessel wall enhancement in intracranial aneurysms.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVWE in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a potential biomarker for the evaluation of IA. The common practice to identify IAs with VWE is mainly based on a visual inspection of MR images, which is subject to errors and inconsistencies. Here, we develop and validate a tool for the visualization, quantification and objective identification of regions with VWE.
methodsN = 41 3D T1-MRI and 3D TOF-MRA IA images from 38 patients were obtained and co-registered. A contrast-enhanced MRI was normalized by the enhancement intensity of the pituitary stalk and signal intensities were mapped onto the surface of IA models generated from segmented MRA. N = 30 IAs were used to identify the optimal signal intensity value to distinguish the enhancing and non-enhancing regions (marked by an experienced neuroradiologist). The remaining IAs (n = 11) were used to validate the threshold. We tested if the enhancement area ratio (EAR-ratio of the enhancing area to the IA surface-area) could identify high risk aneurysms as identified by the ISUIA clinical score.
resultsA normalized intensity of 0.276 was the optimal threshold to delineate enhancing regions, with a validation accuracy of 81.7%. In comparing the overlap between the identified enhancement regions against those marked by the neuroradiologist, our method had a dice coefficient of 71.1%. An EAR of 23% was able to discriminate high-risk cases with an AUC of 0.7.
conclusionsWe developed and validated a pipeline for the visualization and objective identification of VWE regions that could potentially help evaluation of IAs become more reliable and consistent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.