Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679430›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Prior Exposure and Toddlers' Sleep-Related Memory for Novel Words.

Emma L Axelsson, Jaclyn Swinton, Isabel Y Jiang, Emma V Parker, Jessica S Horst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma L AxelssonSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6038-6254
Jaclyn SwintonResearch School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia.
Isabel Y JiangResearch School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia.
Emma V ParkerResearch School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia.
Jessica S HorstSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children can easily link a novel word to a novel, unnamed object-something referred to as fast mapping. Despite the ease and speed with which children do this, their memories for novel fast-mapped words can be poor unless they receive memory supports such as further exposure to the words or sleep. Axelsson, Swinton, Winiger, and Horst (2018) found that 2.5-year-old children who napped after fast mapping had better retention of novel words than children who did not nap. Retention declined for those who did not nap. The children received no memory supports and determined the word-object mappings independently. Previous studies report enhanced memories after sleeping in children and adults, but the napping children's retention in the Axelsson et al. study remained steady across time. We report a follow-up investigation where memory supports are provided after fast mapping to test whether memories would be enhanced following napping. Children's retention of novel words improved and remained greater than chance; however, there was no nap effect with no significant difference between the children who napped and those who did not. These findings suggest that when memory supports are provided, retention improves, and the word-object mappings remain stable over time. When memory traces are weak and labile, such as after fast mapping, without further memory supports, sleeping soon after helps stabilise and prevent decay of word-object mappings.

Indexed as

declarative memorymemory strengthnappingsleep-related memoryword learning

Identifiers

PMID34679430
PMCPMC8534215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.