Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679372›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2021

Cognitive Functions in Patients after Carotid Artery Revascularization-A Narrative Review.

Magdalena Piegza, Gniewko Więckiewicz, Dawid Wierzba, Jacek Piegza

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05539781 (Change of Hemodynamics and Cerebral Functions After Carotid Artery Revascularization), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05539781 recruitingnot on this map

Change of Hemodynamics and Cerebral Functions After Carotid Artery Revascularization

TypeobservationalSponsorBeijing Friendship HospitalRan2020 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsCarotid Artery Diseases, Carotid Artery Stenosis, Cerebrovascular, Disorder, Arteriosclerotic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Ischemia as a common trigger for Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena PiegzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Góry, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8009-7118
Gniewko WięckiewiczDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Góry, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2404-393X
Dawid WierzbaIndependent Public Heath Care Psychiatric Hospital, 44-180 Toszek, Poland.
Jacek PiegzaThird Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PL1 Military Clinical Hospital with Outpatient Clinic · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carotid revascularization may lead to improved cognitive function beyond stroke prevention. This article summarizes the conclusions from available studies on the effects of carotid reperfusion procedures on cognitive function. The papers cited used different neuropsychological tests for cognitive assessment, resulting in different methodologies and the results obtained were not always convergent. However, most studies reported an improvement in neurocognitive abilities after both vascular interventions, but a more precise assessment of the specific benefits is still awaited. Clinical determinants to predict the effects of these treatments on cognitive function are still being sought, but results are not yet satisfactory. In view of these studies, carotid stenosis seems to be an independent risk factor for cognitive deterioration, and the main mechanisms responsible are embolism and cerebral hypoperfusion. The aim of this study is to order the knowledge about the effects of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and endarterectomy (CEA) on neurocognitive functions and to verify the usefulness of using these treatments.

Indexed as

carotid artery stentingcarotid endarterectomycognitive functions

Identifiers

PMID34679372
PMCPMC8533732
OpenAlexW3202314518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.