ArticleBrain sciences2021
Voltage-Sensitive Dye versus Intrinsic Signal Optical Imaging: Comparison of Tactile Responses in Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortices of Rats.
Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optical Devices for the Diagnosis and Management of Spinal Cord Injuries: A Review.Biosensors · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging assume that hemodynamic responses have roughly linear relationships with underlying neural activity. However, to accurately investigate the neurovascular transfer function and compare its variability across brain regions, it is necessary to obtain full-field imaging of both electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses under various stimulus conditions with superior spatiotemporal resolution. Optical imaging combined with voltage-sensitive dye (VSD) and intrinsic signals (IS) is a powerful tool to address this issue. We performed VSD and IS imaging in the primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices of rats to obtain optical maps of whisker-evoked responses. There were characteristic differences in sensory responses between the S1 and S2 cortices: VSD imaging revealed more localized excitatory and stronger inhibitory neural activity in S1 than in S2. IS imaging revealed stronger metabolic responses in S1 than in S2. We calculated the degree of response to compare the sensory responses between cortical regions and found that the ratio of the degree of response of S2 to S1 was similar, irrespective of whether the ratio was determined by VSD or IS imaging. These results suggest that neurovascular coupling does not vary between the S1 and S2 cortices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.