Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679105›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Automated quality assessment of cognitive behavioral therapy sessions through highly contextualized language representations.

Nikolaos Flemotomos, Victor R Martinez, Zhuohao Chen, Torrey A Creed, David C Atkins, Shrikanth Narayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Scoping review on natural language processing applications in counselling and psychotherapy.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nikolaos FlemotomosSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5227-0246
Victor R MartinezSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Zhuohao ChenSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Torrey A CreedDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0860-2498
David C AtkinsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Shrikanth NarayananSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1052-6204

Funding

Implementation of Technology-Based Evaluation of Motivational InterviewingR01AA018673 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, DAVID CHARLES, NARAYANAN, SHRIKANTH · 2010 to 2020
$5.9M
Technology-supported training and quality assurance for psychosocial interventionsR56MH118550 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ATKINS, DAVID CHARLES, CREED, TORREY A. · 2019 to 2019
$832k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018673NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH118550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During a psychotherapy session, the counselor typically adopts techniques which are codified along specific dimensions (e.g., 'displays warmth and confidence', or 'attempts to set up collaboration') to facilitate the evaluation of the session. Those constructs, traditionally scored by trained human raters, reflect the complex nature of psychotherapy and highly depend on the context of the interaction. Recent advances in deep contextualized language models offer an avenue for accurate in-domain linguistic representations which can lead to robust recognition and scoring of such psychotherapy-relevant behavioral constructs, and support quality assurance and supervision. In this work, we propose a BERT-based model for automatic behavioral scoring of a specific type of psychotherapy, called Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), where prior work is limited to frequency-based language features and/or short text excerpts which do not capture the unique elements involved in a spontaneous long conversational interaction. The model focuses on the classification of therapy sessions with respect to the overall score achieved on the widely-used Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS), but is trained in a multi-task manner in order to achieve higher interpretability. BERT-based representations are further augmented with available therapy metadata, providing relevant non-linguistic context and leading to consistent performance improvements. We train and evaluate our models on a set of 1,118 real-world therapy sessions, recorded and automatically transcribed. Our best model achieves an F1 score equal to 72.61% on the binary classification task of low vs. high total CTRS.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCognitive Behavioral TherapyData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersModels, PsychologicalNatural Language ProcessingPsychiatric Status Rating Scales

Identifiers

PMID34679105
PMCPMC8535177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.