Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34679064›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2021

Evaluation of a Modified Bit Device to Obtain Saliva Samples from Horses.

Aviva Vincent, Robin Marie Peth-Pierce, Meghan A Morrissey, Mary C Acri, Fei Guo, Lauren Seibel, Kimberly E Hoagwood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Volunteer Engagement within Equine Assisted Services.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aviva VincentFieldstone Farm Therapeutic Riding Center, 16497 Snyder Rd, Chagrin Falls, OH 44023, USA.
Robin Marie Peth-PiercePublic Health Communications Consulting, LLC., 16678 State Rd., North Royalton, OH 44133, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9695-505X
Meghan A MorrisseyDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone Health, New York University (NYU), One Park Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Mary C AcriDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone Health, New York University (NYU), One Park Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Fei GuoDivision of Biostatistics, NYU Langone Health, New York University (NYU), One Park Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Lauren SeibelDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone Health, New York University (NYU), One Park Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Kimberly E HoagwoodDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone Health, New York University (NYU), One Park Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
New York University · USKnoxville College · USPublic Health Solutions · US

Funding

National Survey of State Policy Decision-making and SimulationP50MH113662 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOAGWOOD, KIMBERLY E. · 2019 to 2022
$6.9M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH113662Unrestricted gift funds to Kimberly Hoagwood 2021 Funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Accounting for the well-being of equine partners is a responsibility of those engaged in Equine-Assisted Services (EAS). Researchers took heed of this call to action by developing an innovative way to collect data to assess the physiological indicators of stress in equine participants. The collection of saliva is considered to be a minimally invasive method of data collection and is typically performed using a cotton swab; however, in equines, the introduction of a foreign object may induce stress; (2) Methods: Researchers used a modified bit to collect pooled saliva in an effort to further reduce stress during the saliva collection process. Additionally, the collection of pooled saliva, via the bit, increases the opportunity to consider additional analyses, such as oxytocin, which is more reliable in pooled saliva than site-specific saliva captured with a swab; (3) Results: A data analysis demonstrated that ample saliva was captured using the modified bit. Observational data supported that the horses demonstrated fewer physical stress signals to the bit than to the swab. Thus, the modified bit is a feasible and valid method for equine salivary sample collection; (4) Conclusions: The results suggest that the modified bit provides a viable method to collect equine saliva and supports national calls to prioritize animal welfare analysis, specifically for horses used within EAS. Future research should enhance methodological rigor, including in the process and timing, thereby contributing to the bit's validation.

Indexed as

equine welfarefeasibilitysaliva collectionstress responsevalidation

Identifiers

PMID34679064
PMCPMC8538290
OpenAlexW3205750876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.