Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34678995›Full record

SynthesisToxins2021

Effects of Uremic Clearance Granules in Uremic Pruritus: A Meta-Analysis.

Ping-Hsun Lu, Jen-Yu Wang, Hui-En Chuo, Po-Hsuan Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Toxins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Study on Nursing Effect of Psychological Intervention on Uremic Hemodialysis Patients.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ping-Hsun LuDepartment of Chinese Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 23142, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0254-6811
Jen-Yu WangMacKay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing, and Management, New Taipei City 11260, Taiwan.
Hui-En ChuoDepartment of Dermatology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 10449, Taiwan.
Po-Hsuan LuDepartment of Dermatology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 10449, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6596-5706
Tzu Chi University · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uremic pruritus is common among patients with advanced or end-stage renal disease, with an incidence of >40% among patients on dialysis. Uremic clearance granules (UCGs) are effective in managing uremic pruritus and delay the progression of chronic kidney disease. We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of UCG in patients with uremic pruritus. Several electronic databases were searched systematically from their inceptions until 19 July 2021. Randomized control trials evaluating the efficacy of UCG in patients with uremic pruritus were selected. Eleven trials including 894 participants were published between 2011 and 2021. Patients administered UCGs had a significantly decreased visual analog scale score (mean difference [MD], -2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.17 to -1.88), serum levels of hsCRP (MD, -2.07 mg/dL; 95% CI, -2.89 to -1.25;

Indexed as

HumansPruritusRenal Insufficiency, ChronicUremiachronic kidney diseaseinflammatory biomarkersmineral metabolismuremic clearance granulesuremic pruritus

Identifiers

PMID34678995
PMCPMC8540647
OpenAlexW3207046633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.