Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34678571›Full record

SynthesisESMO open2021

The prognostic and predictive impact of low estrogen receptor expression in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

N-M Paakkola, A Karakatsanis, D Mauri, T Foukakis, A Valachis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in ESMO open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07521397 (Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data of Patients With Early-stage Breast Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Dose-dense Sequential Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07521397 completednot on this map

Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data of Patients With Early-stage Breast Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Dose-dense Sequential Chemotherapy (Ddsc): a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Study

TypeobservationalSponsorHellenic Cooperative Oncology GroupRan1996 to 2022Enrolled5,358ConditionsBreast Cancer, Early Stage Breast Cancer, Adjuvant Chemotherapy, Prognosis Breast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

N-M PaakkolaSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
A KarakatsanisDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
D MauriFaculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
T FoukakisDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
A ValachisDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. Electronic address: antonios.valachis@oru.se.
Örebro University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Ioannina · GRUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraditionally, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer has been defined as tumors with ≥1% positive for ER. The updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines recommend that tumors with ER expression of 1%-10% should be classified as ER-low-positive, recognizing the limited clinical evidence on the prognostic and predictive role of low ER expression. We aimed to investigate the predictive role of ER-low expression to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NeoCT) and the prognostic significance of ER-low expressing breast tumors compared with ER-positive or ER-negative breast tumors.

methodsA meta-analysis was conducted using the Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines and eligible articles were identified on PubMed and ISI Web of Science databases. The primary outcome was pathologic complete response and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Twelve retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. NeoCT resulted in higher pathologic complete response among patients with ER-low expression compared with ER-positive and comparable to ER-negative. Patients with ER-low breast cancer had a statistically significant worse DFS and OS compared with patients with ER-positive breast cancer, whereas no difference in DFS or OS was observed between ER-low and ER-negative subgroups. DISCUSSION: The current evidence suggests that ER-low breast cancer has a more similar outcome to ER-negative than to ER-positive breast cancer in terms of DFS and OS. ER-low expression seems also to have a predictive role regarding NeoCT. Considering the certainty of current evidence categorized as low to moderate, our results urge the need for well-designed prospective studies investigating the molecular background and the most appropriate treatment strategy for ER-low expressing breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsReceptors, EstrogenFemaleHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesReceptors, Estrogenadjuvantbreast cancerER-lowmeta-analysisneoadjuvant chemotherapyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID34678571
PMCPMC8531568
OpenAlexW3205023169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.