Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34678487›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Configuring intracortical microelectrode arrays and stimulus parameters to minimize neuron loss during prolonged intracortical electrical stimulation.

Douglas McCreery, Martin Han, Victor Pikov, Carol Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Short-Term Effects of Gamma Stimulation on Neuroinflammation at the Tissue-Electrode Interface in Motor Cortex.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Charge Injection Enhancement Comparisons of Iridium Oxide MicroelectrodesInternational IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas McCreeryHuntington Medical Research Institutes, 686 South Fair Oaks Ave, Pasadena, CA, 91105, USA. Electronic address: douglas.mccreery@hmri.org.
Martin HanDept. of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. Electronic address: martin.han@uconn.edu.
Victor PikovMedipace, Inc. Pasadena, CA, USA. Electronic address: pikov@hotmail.com.
Carol MillerKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: carolmil@usc.edu.
Huntington Medical Research Institutes · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Configuring microelectrodes for safe and effective chronic electrical stimulationR01NS088379 · NINDS · HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES · PI MCCREERY, DOUGLAS BUCHANAN · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
Towards Clinical Translation of Penetrating Multisite Device for Cochlear NucleusR01DC014044 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI HAN, MARTIN · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Chronically-Implantable Multisite Microelectrode ArraysR24NS086603 · NINDS · HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES · PI HAN, MARTIN · 2015 to 2016
$842k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014044NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088379NINDS NIH HHS R24 NS086603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have shown that neurons of the cerebral cortex can be injured by implantation of, and stimulation with, implanted microelectrodes.

objectivesObjective 1 was to determine parameters of microstimulation delivered through multisite intracortical microelectrode arrays that will activate neurons of the feline cerebral cortex without causing loss of neurons.

objective2 was to determine if the stimulus parameters that induced loss of cortical neurons differed for all cortical neurons vs. the subset of inhibitory neurons expressing parvalbumin.

methodsThe intracortical microstimulation was applied for 7 h/day for 20 days (140 h). Microelectrode site areas were 2000 and 4000 μm

resultsNeuron loss due to stimulation was minimal at Q = 2 Ncp, but at 8 Ncp, 20%-50% of neurons within 250 μm of the stimulated microelectrodes were lost, compared to unstimulated microelectrodes. Loss was greatest in tissue facing electrode sites. Stimulation-induced loss was similar for neurons labeled for NeuN and for inhibitory neurons expressing parvalbumin. Correlation between neuron loss and QD was not significant. Electrodes in the medullary pyramidal tract recorded neuronal activity evoked by stimulation in the cerebral cortex. The pyramidal neurons were activated by intracortical stimulation of 2 nC/phase. 140 h of microstimulation at 2 nC/phase and 50 Hz induced minimal neuron loss.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexNeuronsAnimalsCatsElectric StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedMicroelectrodesPyramidal CellsIntracortical microelectrodesNeural loss during electrical stimulationStimulus charge densityStimulus charge per phase

Identifiers

PMID34678487
PMCPMC8800486
OpenAlexW3206657621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.