ArticleFree radical biology & medicine2021
The two-Cys-type TetR repressor GbaA confers resistance under disulfide and electrophile stress in Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in Free radical biology & medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bacterial Metallostasis: Metal Sensing, Metalloproteome Remodeling, and Metal Trafficking.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Article
- Transcription-replication interactions reveal principles of bacterial genome regulation.Research square · 2023Article
- How to Recruit a Promiscuous Enzyme to Serve a New Function.Biochemistry · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus has to cope with oxidative and electrophile stress during host-pathogen interactions. The TetR-family repressor GbaA was shown to sense electrophiles, such as N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) via monothiol mechanisms of the two conserved Cys55 or Cys104 residues in vitro. In this study, we further investigated the regulation and function of the GbaA repressor and its Cys residues in S. aureus COL. The GbaA-controlled gbaAB-SACOL2595-97 and SACOL2592-nmrA-2590 operons were shown to respond only weakly 3-10-fold to oxidants, electrophiles or antibiotics in S. aureus COL, but are 57-734-fold derepressed in the gbaA deletion mutant, indicating that the physiological inducer is still unknown. Moreover, the gbaA mutant remained responsive to disulfide and electrophile stress, pointing to additional redox control mechanisms of both operons. Thiol-stress induction of the GbaA regulon was strongly diminished in both single Cys mutants, supporting that both Cys residues are required for redox-sensing in vivo. While GbaA and the single Cys mutants are reversible oxidized under diamide and allicin stress, these thiol switches did not affect the DNA binding activity. The repressor activity of GbaA could be only partially inhibited with NEM in vitro. Survival assays revealed that the gbaA mutant confers resistance under diamide, allicin, NEM and methylglyoxal stress, which was mediated by the SACOL2592-90 operon encoding for a putative glyoxalase and oxidoreductase. Altogether, our results support that the GbaA repressor functions in the defense against oxidative and electrophile stress in S. aureus. GbaA represents a 2-Cys-type redox sensor, which requires another redox-sensing regulator and an unknown thiol-reactive ligand for full derepression of the GbaA regulon genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.