Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34678148›Full record

ReviewNeuron2021

The learning of prospective and retrospective cognitive maps within neural circuits.

Vijay Mohan K Namboodiri, Garret D Stuber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Memory erasure by dopamine-gated retrospective learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vijay Mohan K NamboodiriDepartment of Neurology, Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: vijaymohan.knamboodiri@ucsf.edu.
Garret D StuberCenter for the Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: gstuber@uw.edu.

Funding

University of Washington Center of Excellence in Opioid Addiction ResearchP30DA048736 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Charles Chavkin · 2019 to 2026
$13.0M
Neural circuit elements that orchestrate cue-reward associationsR37DA032750 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Garret D Stuber · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
Lateral Hypothalamic Circuits for Feeding and ReinforcementR01DA038168 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STUBER, GARRET D · 2014 to 2025
$4.0M
Midbrain Neural Circuit Elements That Underlie Cue-Reward AssociationsR01DA032750 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STUBER, GARRET D · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Neural encoding of associative learning by orbitofrontal cortex circuitsR00MH118422 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI K NAMBOODIRI, VIJAY MOHAN · 2020 to 2022
$747k
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA048736NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032750NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038168NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA032750NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH118422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain circuits are thought to form a "cognitive map" to process and store statistical relationships in the environment. A cognitive map is commonly defined as a mental representation that describes environmental states (i.e., variables or events) and the relationship between these states. This process is commonly conceptualized as a prospective process, as it is based on the relationships between states in chronological order (e.g., does reward follow a given state?). In this perspective, we expand this concept on the basis of recent findings to postulate that in addition to a prospective map, the brain forms and uses a retrospective cognitive map (e.g., does a given state precede reward?). In doing so, we demonstrate that many neural signals and behaviors (e.g., habits) that seem inflexible and non-cognitive can result from retrospective cognitive maps. Together, we present a significant conceptual reframing of the neurobiological study of associative learning, memory, and decision making.

Indexed as

LearningRewardBrainCognitionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34678148
PMCPMC8809184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.