Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34677903›Full record

ArticleIntegrated environmental assessment and management2022

Restoration experiments in polymetallic nodule areas.

Sabine Gollner, Matthias Haeckel, Felix Janssen, Nene Lefaible, Massimiliano Molari, Stavroula Papadopoulou, Gert-Jan Reichart, João Trabucho Alexandre, Annemiek Vink, Ann Vanreusel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sabine GollnerDepartment of Ocean Systems, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Den Burg, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9322-9258
Matthias HaeckelGEOMAR Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Felix JanssenHGF MPG Joint Research Group for Deep Sea Ecology and Technology, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Bremerhaven, Germany.
Nene LefaibleMarine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Massimiliano MolariHGF MPG Joint Research Group for Deep Sea Ecology and Technology, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology (MPI), Bremen, Germany.
Stavroula PapadopoulouWerkStaat, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gert-Jan ReichartDepartment of Ocean Systems, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Den Burg, the Netherlands.
João Trabucho AlexandreDepartment of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Annemiek VinkFederal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Hannover, Germany.
Ann VanreuselMarine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

BGR ship time for IP21Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 03F0812A-HBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung ship time for SO268NWO-ALW 856.18.001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep-seabed polymetallic nodule mining can have multiple adverse effects on benthic communities, such as permanent loss of habitat by removal of nodules and habitat modification of sediments. One tool to manage biodiversity risks is the mitigation hierarchy, including avoidance, minimization of impacts, rehabilitation and/or restoration, and offset. We initiated long-term restoration experiments at sites in polymetallic nodule exploration contract areas in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone that were (i) cleared of nodules by a preprototype mining vehicle, (ii) disturbed by dredge or sledge, (iii) undisturbed, and (iv) naturally devoid of nodules. To accommodate for habitat loss, we deployed >2000 artificial ceramic nodules to study the possible effect of substrate provision on the recovery of biota and its impact on sediment biogeochemistry. Seventy-five nodules were recovered after eight weeks and had not been colonized by any sessile epifauna. All other nodules will remain on the seafloor for several years before recovery. Furthermore, to account for habitat modification of the top sediment layer, sediment in an epibenthic sledge track was loosened by a metal rake to test the feasibility of sediment decompaction to facilitate soft-sediment recovery. Analyses of granulometry and nutrients one month after sediment decompaction revealed that sand fractions are proportionally lower within the decompacted samples, whereas total organic carbon values are higher. Considering the slow natural recovery rates of deep-sea communities, these experiments represent the beginning of a ~30-year study during which we expect to gain insights into the nature and timing of the development of hard-substrate communities and the influence of nodules on the recovery of disturbed sediment communities. Results will help us understand adverse long-term effects of nodule removal, providing an evidence base for setting criteria for the definition of "serious harm" to the environment. Furthermore, accompanying research is needed to define a robust ecosystem baseline in order to effectively identify restoration success. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:682-696. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemMetalsMiningMetalsArtificial nodulesDeep seaMineralsMiningMitigation

Identifiers

PMID34677903
PMCPMC9299087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.