Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34677734›Full record

ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2021

The variation in promoter sequences of the Akt3 gene between cow and buffalo revealed different responses against mastitis.

Farmanullah Farmanullah, Mostafa Gouda, Zhang Min, Xu Sutong, Mohib Ullah KaKar, Sami Ullah Khan, Muhammad Salim, Momen Khan, Zia Ur Rehman, Hira Sajjad Talpur and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TNFRSF1A and NCF1 May Act as Hub Genes in Mastitis.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Farmanullah FarmanullahFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, National Center for Livestock Breeding Genetics and Genomics LUAWMS, Uthal, Balochistan, Pakistan. farman_aup@yahoo.com.
Mostafa GoudaCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-4145
Zhang MinKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Xu SutongKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Mohib Ullah KaKarFaculty of Marine Sciences, Lasbela University of Agriculture Water and Marine Sciences (LUAWMS), Uthal, Balochistan, 90150, Pakistan.
Sami Ullah KhanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Muhammad SalimDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Management, The University of Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Momen KhanDirectorate General (Extension) Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Bacha Khan Chowk, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Zia Ur RehmanKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Hira Sajjad TalpurKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Faheem Ahmed KhanKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Nuruliarizki Shinta PandupuspitasariKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Zhang ShujunKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China. sjxiaozhang@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNDiponegoro University · IDGovernment of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa · PKLasbela University of Agriculture Water and Marine Science · PKNational Research Centre · EGUniversitas Gadjah Mada · IDUniversity of Haripur · PK

Funding

systematic project of guangxi key laboratory of disaster prevention and structural safety SNKF-2016-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerine/threonine kinase 3 (AKT3) is a protein-coding gene that is associated with several cattle immune diseases including different tumors and cancers. The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in structures and functions of AKT3 of cow and buffalo cattle.

methodsThe sequence differences of gene-coding sequence (CDS) and core promoter region of AKT3 in cow and buffalo were analyzed by using bioinformatics tools and PCR sequencing. Also, the functional analysis of promoter regulating gene expression by RT-PCR was performed using 500 Holstein cows and buffalos. And, evaluation of AKT3 inflammatory response to the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced mastitis was performed between both species.

resultsThe results revealed the variation in 6 exons out of 13 exons of the two species of CDS. Also, 4 different regions in 3-kb promoters of the AKT3 gene were significantly different between cow and buffalo species, in which cow's AKT3 promoter sequence region was started from - 371 to - 1247, while in buffalo, the sequence was started from - 371 to - 969 of the promoter crucial region. Thus, the promoter was overexpressed in cows compared to buffaloes. As a result, significant differences (P < 0.05) between the two species in the AKT3 gene expression level related to the LPS stimulation in their mammary epithelial cell line.

conclusionsThis study emphasized the great importance of the structural differences of AKT3 between the animal species on their different responses against immune diseases like mastitis.

Indexed as

AKT3ExpressionImmune responseLPSmRNApGL3Promoter

Identifiers

PMID34677734
PMCPMC8536807
OpenAlexW3206621137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.