ArticleNeuroradiology2022
MR findings suggestive of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in 117 patients with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The long-term outcomes of surgical approaches for managing cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Cognitive impairment in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A conceptual framework and therapeutic implications.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Reliability of High-resolution Gadolinium-enhanced MR Cisternography and Gasket-seal Technique for Management of Anterior Skull Base Defects.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to document the prevalence of MR findings suggestive of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in patients undergoing endoscopic repair of spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea (SCSFR).
methodsIn a retrospective study, MR images of 117 consecutive patients who had undergone endoscopic repair of SCSFR were evaluated for features suggestive of IIH (empty sella, widened optic nerve sheath, tortuous optic nerve, flattened posterior globe, and enlarged Meckel's cave). Pituitary height was used to diagnose partial and complete empty sella. MR images were independently evaluated by two of the authors without knowledge of the clinical findings. Consensus method was used to resolve differences between the two evaluators.
resultsEmpty or partially empty sella was diagnosed in the MR of 105 (89.7%) patients. In 38/105 (36.2%) patients with empty/partial empty sella, no additional MR findings were present. In 43/105 (41%) patients, one or more of the MR features with high specificity for diagnosis of IIH (flattened posterior globe and enlarged Meckel's cave) were seen. In the other 24 (22.9%) additional MR findings, less specific for IIH (widened optic nerve sheath, tortuous optic nerve) were noted. Papilledema was seen in 11 of 60 (18.3%) patients who underwent funduscopic examination. All patients with papilledema had empty/partial empty sella, and 9/11 (81.8%) had an additional MR finding suggestive of IIH.
conclusionThe majority of patients with SCSFR have MR imaging features of IIH. These imaging features should be a major component of previously published modified diagnostic criteria for IIH in patients with SCSFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.