Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34677275›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Effectiveness and Safety of First-Line Pembrolizumab in Older Adults with PD-L1 Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Alberta Immunotherapy Database.

Heidi A I Grosjean, Samantha Dolter, Daniel E Meyers, Philip Q Ding, Igor Stukalin, Siddhartha Goutam, Shiying Kong, Quincy Chu, Daniel Y C Heng, D Gwyn Bebb and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heidi A I GrosjeanDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.
Samantha DolterDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1161-8087
Daniel E MeyersDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7619-7327
Philip Q DingOncology Outcomes, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0413-5485
Igor StukalinDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.
Siddhartha GoutamFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-2357
Shiying KongDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.
Quincy ChuCross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G1Z2, Canada.
Daniel Y C HengDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.
D Gwyn BebbDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.
Don G MorrisDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.
Winson Y CheungDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.
Aliyah PabaniDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N2, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment of non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC), with multiple landmark clinical trials establishing the efficacy of these agents. However, many patients who receive immunotherapy in clinical practice would be considered clinical trial ineligible. One such population that is often under-represented in clinical trials is older adults. In the current study, we evaluated clinical and safety outcomes in this population. Overall, older adults (>70 years of age) and younger adults had comparable clinical outcomes with an equivalent objective response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and median overall survival (

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedAlbertaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedB7-H1 AntigenHumansImmunotherapyRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedB7-H1 Antigenpembrolizumabimmunotherapynon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)older adults

Identifiers

PMID34677275
PMCPMC8534423
OpenAlexW3206449862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.