Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34677244›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Frontline Treatment of the Young, Fit Patient with CLL: A Canadian Perspective.

Jacqueline Costello, Matthew Kang, Versha Banerji

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline CostelloFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada.
Matthew KangFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Versha BanerjiDepartments of Internal Medicine and Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7415-8818
CancerCare Manitoba · CAJoseph Brant Hospital · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From a Canadian perspective, there has been a limited discussion on the frontline management of young, fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The prevalence of this population ranges between 2 and 22 per 100,000 persons in Canada and varies by region. Until recently, fixed-duration fludarabine-based chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) was the primary treatment option in Canada for this patient population. The ECOG1912 trial has since demonstrated that ibrutinib and rituximab therapy are as effective as fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) in this population. The ALLIANCE trial showed that rituximab added no incremental benefit to ibrutinib. Canadian payors and physicians adopted ibrutinib monotherapy as the CLL standard of care, even in the young, fit population, although frontline ibrutinib therapy is often reimbursed by provincial public drug plans only in patients with high-risk disease or those who are unfit to receive fludarabine. Young, fit patients with CLL and their physicians may now choose between continuous ibrutinib monotherapy and fixed-duration CIT with FCR. Factors affecting this choice include patient preference and the short- and long-term toxicity profiles of both regimens, and a risk-based algorithm is provided. As new continuous-therapy options enter the market, all treatment choices present benefits and risks that must be communicated to the patient.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCanadaHumansPyrazolesRituximabPyrazolesRituximabalgorithmCanadianchronic lymphocytic leukemiaCLLfrontline treatment

Identifiers

PMID34677244
PMCPMC8534822
OpenAlexW3201943516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.