ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
Controversies in ERCP: Technical aspects.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of preferred double guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy for difficult biliary cannulation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ultrasound of the Gallbladder-An Update on Measurements, Reference Values, Variants and Frequent Pathologies: A Scoping Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An international survey on the geographical differences in practice patterns and training of endoscopic ultrasound.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2025Article
- Sex-related association between smoke exposure and gallstones in a US population: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of modified dual knife fistulotomy in complex ERCP cases involving type 3 papilla.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- [Imaging in chronic inflammatory bowel disease].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Standard Cannulation versus Fistulotomy for Biliary Access in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Should We Expect the Same Success when Treating Choledocholithiasis?GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Real-world evidence comparing early and late pancreatic stent placement to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Indomethacin Does Not Reduce Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High-Risk Patients Receiving Pancreatic Stenting.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Review
- Pancreatic ultrasound: An update of measurements, reference values, and variations of the pancreas.Ultrasound international open · 2024Review
- Article
- EUS in pediatric patients.Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the series of papers on controversies of biliopancreatic drainage procedures is to discuss pros and cons of the varying clinical practices and techniques in ERCP and EUS for drainage of biliary and pancreatic ducts. While the first part focuses on indications, clinical and imaging prerequisites prior to ERCP, sedation options, post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis, and other related technical topics, the second part discusses specific procedural ERCP techniques including precut techniques and their timing as well as management algorithms. In addition, reviews on controversies in EUS-guided bile duct and pancreatic drainage procedures are under preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.