Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34677090›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021

The role of motion management and position verification in lymphoma radiotherapy.

Marianne Aznar, Georgios Ntentas, Marika Enmark, Stella Flampouri, Peter Meidhal Petersen, Umberto Ricardi, Mario Levis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Marianne AznarDivision of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Georgios NtentasNuffield department of population health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Marika EnmarkDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Stella FlampouriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Peter Meidhal PetersenDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Umberto RicardiDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Mario LevisDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITEmory University · USGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBRigshospitalet · DKSkåne University Hospital · SEUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decades, the substantial technical progress in radiation oncology offered the opportunity for more accurate planning and delivery of treatment. At the same time, the evolution of systemic treatment and the advent of modern diagnostic tools allowed for more accurate staging and consequently a safe reduction of radiotherapy (RT) target volumes and RT doses in the treatment of lymphomas. As a result, incidental irradiation of organs at risk was reduced, with a consequent reduction of severe late toxicity in long-term lymphoma survivors. Nevertheless, these innovations warrant that professionals pay attention to concurrently ensure precise planning and dose delivery to the target volume and safe sparing of the organs at risk. In particular, target and organ motion should be carefully managed in order to prevent any compromise of treatment efficacy. Several aspects should be taken into account during the treatment pathway to minimise uncertainties and to apply a valuable motion management strategy, when needed. These include: reliable image registration between diagnostic and planning radiologic exams to facilitate the contouring process, image guidance to limit positioning uncertainties and to ensure the accuracy of dose delivery and management of lung motion through procedures of respiratory gating and breath control. In this review, we will cover the current clinical approaches to minimise these uncertainties in patients treated with modern RT techniques, with a particular focus on mediastinal lymphoma. In addition, since uncertainties have a different impact on the dose deposition of protons compared to conventional x-rays, the role of motion management and position verification in proton beam therapy (PBT) will be discussed in a separate section.

Indexed as

Breath HoldingHumansLymphomaMotionOrgans at RiskPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID34677090
PMCPMC8553184
OpenAlexW3207554394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.