ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2021
Cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cachexia Index in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor of prognosis in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- The Prognostic Impact of the Cachexia Index in Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Review
- Evaluation of skeletal muscle indicators following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: verification of skeletal muscle mass adjustment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Observational
- The prognostic value of cachexia index in patients with lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Cachexia index as a prognostic marker in patients undergoing biliary tract cancer resection.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Multimodal AI-driven Biomarker for Early Detection of Cancer Cachexia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Low Preoperative Cachexia Index Is Associated with Severe Postoperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of cachexia index determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of combining preoperative immune-inflammatory-nutritional index and tumor biomarkers in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The impact of cachexia index combined with BMI trajectory on survival outcomes in patients with cancer cachexia.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The cachexia index is a prognostic factor for patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer.Surgery today · 2024Article
- An integrative review of cancer-related cachexia and sarcopenia: A different focus in malignant hematology.Health sciences review (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Developing and validating a Modified Cachexia Index to predict the outcomes for colorectal cancer after radical surgery.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of body composition using torso CT from PET/CT with bioelectrical impedance and muscle strength in healthy adults.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Skeletal Muscle Segmentation at the Level of the Third Lumbar Vertebra (L3) in Low-Dose Computed Tomography: A Lightweight Algorithm.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Defining and Addressing Research Priorities in Cancer Cachexia through Transdisciplinary Collaboration.Cancers · 2024Review
- Cachexia index for prognostication in surgical patients with locally advanced oesophageal or gastric cancer: multicentre cohort study.The British journal of surgery · 2024Article
- The Utility of the Cachexia Index and the Modified Glasgow Score in Young Patients With Breast Cancer.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer cachexia is known to adversely affect the clinical course in patients with malignant lymphoma. The cachexia index (CXI) is a potential biomarker of cancer cachexia, and its implications for the prognosis and treatment outcome of lung cancer and aggressive lymphoma has been assessed in previous studies.
methodsA total of 267 patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) immunochemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The CXI was calculated as the skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin/neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Although previous studies measured the SMI using the muscles of the L3 vertebral level, the present study used both the L3 vertebral muscles and the pectoralis muscles (PM) at the T4 vertebral level to measure the SMI. Depending on the type of muscles used, the CXI was termed the L3-CXI or PM-CXI. Using sex-specific cutoff values for CXI, the patients were categorized as follows: (i) high-CXI group (high L3-CXI and high PM-CXI), (ii) intermediate-CXI group (high L3-CXI and low PM-CXI), and (iii) low-CXI group (low L3-CXI and low PM-CXI).
resultsComplete responses to R-CHOP were obtained in 145/173 (83.8%), 25/36 (69.4%), and 27/57 (47.4%) patients in the high-CXI, intermediate-CXI, and low-CXI groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Treatment-related anaemia (15.6%, 30.6%, and 26.3%, P = 0.038), thrombocytopenia (21.4%, 36.1%, and 43.9%, P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (23.7%, 44.4%, and 36.8%, P = 0.022), and any nonhaematologic toxicity (31.2%, 44.4%, and 54.4%, P = 0.001) of Grade 3 or more were more common in the lower CXI groups than in the higher-CXI groups. Early treatment discontinuation for reasons other than lymphoma progression also occurred more frequently in the low-CXI group (24/57, 42.1%) compared with the intermediate-CXI (5/36, 13.9%) and high-CXI (18/173, 10.4%) groups (P < 0.001). Median overall survival in the high-CXI, intermediate-CXI, and low-CXI groups was not reached, 50.6 months, and 14.5 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that low CXI was an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 2.103, 95% confidence interval 1.278-3.460, P = 0.003).
conclusionsWe suggest that in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the CXI is a biomarker for cancer cachexia that can predict survival, treatment response, treatment-related toxicity, and compliance with R-CHOP. Patients were more clearly stratified by this new CXI category compared with the classifications described in previous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.