ArticleNursing forum2022
Self-directed learning readiness and learning styles among Omani nursing students: Implications for online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Nursing forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of academic mentorship and self-efficacy in enhancing self-directed learning readiness among undergraduate nursing students.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Self-directed learning ability among undergraduate allied health sciences students in Chennai, India: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The effect of learning styles on the academic achievement of nursing students: a cross-sectional study.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Exploring self-directed learning readiness and related factors: the role of time management skills in nursing students.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Readiness for self-directed learning among basic sciences medical students.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Locus of Control and Self-Directed Learning Readiness of Nursing Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study from Saudi Arabia.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
- Article
- Undergraduate student nurses' views of online learning.Teaching and learning in nursing : official journal of the National Organization for Assciate Degree Nursing · 2022Article
- Development and Evaluation of Interactive Flipped e-Learning (iFEEL) for Pharmacy Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Self-directed learning readiness and learning styles among Omani nursing students: Implications for online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.Nursing forum · 2022Article
- Student teachers' perceived changes of learning conditions during COVID-19: The role of internal resource management strategies, intrinsic motivation, and preferences for lesson formats.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic compelled many academic institutions to resort to distance learning and online education, requiring a higher degree of student self-direction and motivation to learn. This study explored self-directed learning (SDL) readiness among nursing students in Oman, their learning styles (LS), and the association of demographic variables and LS with SDL.
methodsThe study, which followed a descriptive, cross-sectional design, surveyed 236 Omani nursing students via an online questionnaire containing two standardized scales: the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale for Nursing Education and the Learning Style Scales.
resultsNursing students were identified as having a low level of SDL (mean = 149.58). Probation status (β = -0.165; p = 0.021) was negatively associated with SDL. In terms of LS, solitary (β = 0.217; p = 0.001), competitive (β = 0.201; p = 0.005), imaginative (β = 0.19; p = 0.012), and perceptive LS (β = 0.437; p = 0.0) were positively associated with SDL. An analytical LS was negatively associated with SDL (β = -0.155; p = 0.022).
conclusionAcademic probation status and an analytical LS both yielded lower SDL scores. Perceptive, solitary, competitive, or imaginative learners tended to have higher SDL scores. Deliberate planning and strategies are necessary to help probation students cope with academic demands, especially with the advent of intensified digital education. Because no single learning environment can fulfill the needs of every LS, nurse educators must implement SDL-aimed teaching and learning strategies that appeal to a variety of learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.