Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34676504›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2021

Transcriptome analysis reveals differing response and tolerance mechanism of EPSPS and GAT genes among transgenic soybeans.

Bing-Fu Guo, Hui-Long Hong, Li-Ping Sun, Yong Guo, Li-Juan Qiu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bing-Fu Guo *The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI) and MOA Key Lab of Soybean Biology (Beijing), Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
Hui-Long Hong *The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI) and MOA Key Lab of Soybean Biology (Beijing), Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
Li-Ping SunJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Oilcrops Biology, Crops Research Institute of Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang, China.
Yong GuoThe National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI) and MOA Key Lab of Soybean Biology (Beijing), Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China. guoyong@caas.cn.
Li-Juan QiuThe National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI) and MOA Key Lab of Soybean Biology (Beijing), Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China. qiulijuan@caas.cn.
Institute of Crop Sciences · CNJiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlyphosate is a broad-spectrum, non-selective systemic herbicide. Introduction of glyphosate tolerance genes such as EPSPS or detoxification genes such as GAT can confer glyphosate tolerance on plants. Our previous study revealed that co-expression of EPSPS and GAT genes conferred higher glyphosate tolerance without "yellow flashing". However, the plant response to glyphosate at the transcriptional level was not investigated. METHODS AND

resultsTo investigate the glyphosate tolerance mechanism, RNA-seq was conducted using four soybean genotypes, including two non-transgenic (NT) soybeans, ZH10 and MD12, and two GM soybeans, HJ698 and ZH10-6. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in these soybeans before and after glyphosate treatment. Similar response to glyphosate in the two NT soybeans and the different effects of glyphosate on the two GM soybeans were identified. As treatment time was prolonged, the expression level of some DEGs involved in shikimate biosynthetic pathway and herbicide targeted cross-pathways was increased or declined continuously in NT soybeans, and altered slightly in HJ698. However, the expression level of some DEGs was altered in ZH10-6 at 12 hpt, while similar expression level of some DEGs involved in shikimate biosynthetic pathway and herbicide targeted cross-pathways was observed in ZH10-6 at 0 hpt and 72 hpt. These observations likely explain the higher glyphosate tolerance in ZH10-6 than in HJ698 and NT soybeans.

conclusionsThese results suggested that GAT and EPSPS genes together play a crucial role in response to glyphosate, the GAT gene may work at the early stage of glyphosate exposure, whereas the EPSPS gene may be activated after the uptake of glyphosate by plants. These findings will provide valuable insight for the molecular basis underlying glyphosate tolerance or glyphosate detoxication.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGlycineGlycine maxGlyphosateHerbicide ResistancePlants, Genetically ModifiedRNA-SeqGlycineGlyphosateEPSPSGATGlyphosate toleranceRNA-seqSoybean

Identifiers

PMID34676504
OpenAlexW3164712420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.