ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2020
Brain structures and cognitive abilities important for the self-monitoring of speech errors.
Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of stroke infarct location on quality of life assessed in a multivariate lesion-symptom mapping study.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Right hemisphere language network plasticity in aphasia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Convergent causal mapping unravels distinct frontal networks for visuospatial selective attention.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Right Hemisphere Language Network Plasticity in Aphasia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Comparison of brain normalization software and lesion compensation techniques in chronic perinatal stroke imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- # Language processing characteristics in normal pressure hydrocephalus: insights from eye-tracking analysis of incorrect responses.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Post-stroke lesion correlates of errors in verbal and spatial production tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Neural Predictors for the Generalization of Semantic and Phonological Treatment to Discourse Performance in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- The parietal architecture binding cognition to sensorimotor integration: a multimodal causal study.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- The effect of feedback timing on category learning and feedback processing in younger and older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- Unraveling Down Syndrome: From Genetic Anomaly to Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Diagnosis.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Listening to Yourself and Watching Your Tongue: Distinct Abilities and Brain Regions for Monitoring Semantic and Phonological Speech Errors.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2023Article
- Structural disconnection of the posterior medial frontal cortex reduces speech error monitoring.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- Intellectual awareness of naming abilities in people with chronic post-stroke aphasia.Neuropsychologia · 2021Article
- Aphasia severity is modulated by race and lesion size in chronic survivors: A retrospective study.Journal of communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The brain structures and cognitive abilities necessary for successful monitoring of one's own speech errors remain unknown. We aimed to inform self-monitoring models by examining the neural and behavioral correlates of phonological and semantic error detection in individuals with post-stroke aphasia. First, we determined whether detection related to other abilities proposed to contribute to monitoring according to various theories, including naming ability, fluency, word-level auditory comprehension, sentence-level auditory comprehension, and executive function. Regression analyses revealed that fluency and executive scores were independent predictors of phonological error detection, while a measure of word-level comprehension related to semantic error detection. Next, we used multivariate lesion-symptom mapping to determine lesion locations associated with reduced error detection. Reduced overall error detection related to damage to a region of frontal white matter extending into dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Detection of phonological errors related to damage to the same areas, but the lesion-behavior association was stronger, suggesting the localization for overall error detection was driven primarily by phonological error detection. These findings demonstrate that monitoring of different error types relies on distinct cognitive functions, and provide causal evidence for the importance of frontal white matter tracts and DLPFC for self-monitoring of speech.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.