Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34676338›Full record

ArticleMedical cannabis and cannabinoids2020

Screening for More than 1,000 Pesticides and Environmental Contaminants in Cannabis by GC/Q-TOF.

Philip L Wylie, Jessica Westland, Mei Wang, Mohamed M Radwan, Chandrani G Majumdar, Mahmoud A ElSohly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical cannabis and cannabinoids, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chemical Authentication and Speciation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables in Indonesia: findings of five-year proficiency testing.Accreditation and quality assurance : journal for quality, comparability and reliability in chemical measurement · 2022
    Article
  6. Use of computational toxicology tools to predictCurrent research in toxicology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philip L WylieAgilent Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
Jessica WestlandAgilent Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
Mei WangNational Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.
Mohamed M RadwanNational Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.
Chandrani G MajumdarNational Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.
Mahmoud A ElSohlyNational Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.
University of Mississippi · USAgilent Technologies (United States) · USElSohly Laboratories (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A method has been developed to screen cannabis extracts for more than 1,000 pesticides and environmental pollutants using a gas chromatograph coupled to a high-resolution accurate mass quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (GC/Q-TOF). An extraction procedure was developed using acetonitrile with solid phase extraction cleanup. Before analysis, extracts were diluted 125:1 with solvent. Two data mining approaches were used together with a retention-time-locked Personal Compound Database and Library (PCDL) containing high-resolution accurate mass spectra for pesticides and other environmental pollutants. (1) A Find-by-Fragments (FbF) software tool extracts several characteristic exact mass ions within a small retention time window where the compound elutes. For each compound in the PCDL, the software evaluates the peak shape and retention time of each ion as well as the monoisotopic exact mass, ion ratios, and other factors to decide if the compound is present or not. (2) A separate approach used Unknowns Analysis (UA) software with a peak-finding algorithm called SureMass to deconvolute peaks in the chromatogram. The accurate mass spectra were searched against the PCDL using spectral matching and retention time as filters. A subset PCDL was generated containing only pesticides that are most likely to be found on foods in the US. With about 250 compounds in the smaller PCDL, there were fewer hits for non-pesticides, and data review was much faster. Organically grown cannabis was used for method development. Twenty-one confiscated cannabis samples were analyzed and ten were found to have no detectable pesticides. The remaining 11 samples had at least one pesticide and one sample had seven detectable residues. Quantitative analysis was run on the confiscated samples for a subset of the pesticides found by screening. Two cannabis samples had residues of carbaryl and malathion that were estimated to be about 10 times greater than the highest US Environmental Protection Agency tolerance set for food and about 4,000 times greater than the Canadian maximum residue limits for dried cannabis flower.

Indexed as

CannabisExtraction methodGas chromatographyHigh-resolution accurate massMarijuanaPersonal Compound Database and LibraryPesticidesQuadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer

Identifiers

PMID34676338
PMCPMC8489331
OpenAlexW3000334426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.