Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34676188›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2021

Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: Moving From Past Pessimism to Future Optimism.

Daniel I McLennan, Elyan C Ruiz Solano, Stephanie S Handler, Joy Lincoln, Michael E Mitchell, Edward C Kirkpatrick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cardiac Interventions in Neonates: State of the Art.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Patient-specific 3DFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Management of Pediatric Pulmonary Vein Stenosis.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel I McLennanSection of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Elyan C Ruiz SolanoHerma Heart Institute, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Stephanie S HandlerSection of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Joy LincolnSection of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Michael E MitchellHerma Heart Institute, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Edward C KirkpatrickSection of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary Vein Stenosis (PVS) is a rare disease with a prevalence of around 1. 7 cases per 100,000 children under 2 years old. Treatment options for this disease have not provided great results and pathophysiology of this condition is still poorly understood. Here, we will review the history of PVS including diagnostic tools and treatments, the current management approach, and what the future holds for this devastating disease.

Indexed as

cardiac catheterizationcongenital cardiothoracic surgerycongenital heart diseasepulmonary vein stenosispulmonary vein stent angioplastysutureless pulmonary vein repair

Identifiers

PMID34676188
PMCPMC8524035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.