Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34676112›Full record

ArticleSustainability2021

Evolving Institutional Arrangements for use of an ecosystem approach in restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern.

Peter J Alsip, John H Hartig, Gail Krantzberg, Kathleen C Williams, Julia Wondolleck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sustainability, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter J AlsipCooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research, University of Michigan, 4840 South State Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108.
John H HartigGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, 2900 Riverside Dr. West, Windsor, Ontario N9C 1A2 Canada.
Gail KrantzbergBooth School of Engineering Practice and Technology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Engineering Technology Building, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 0A3 Canada.
Kathleen C WilliamsGreat Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Blvd., Duluth, MN 55804.
Julia WondolleckUniversity of Michigan, School for Environment and Sustainability, 440 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 1987 Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement required Remedial Action Plans (RAPs) be collaboratively generated between local stakeholders and government agencies to implement an ecosystem approach in cleaning up 43 historically polluted Areas of Concern (AOCs) throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes. The institutional arrangements that have emerged over the past 35 years to foster an ecosystem approach in RAPs are expected to have changed over time and be varied in some aspects-reflecting unique socio-ecological contexts of each AOC-while also sharing some characteristics that were either derived from the minimally prescribed framework or developed convergently. Here we surveyed institutional arrangements to describe changes over time relevant to advancing an ecosystem approach in restoring beneficial uses in the 43 AOCs. While eight AOCs evidenced little institutional change, the remaining 35 AOCs demonstrated a growing involvement of local organizations in RAPs, which has enhanced local capacity and ownership and helped strengthen connections to broader watershed initiatives. We also noted an expansion of strategic partnerships that has strengthened science-policy-management linkages and an increasing emphasis on sustainability among RAP institutions. Our study details how institutional arrangements in a decentralized restoration program have evolved to implement an ecosystem approach and address new challenges.

Indexed as

Ecosystem-based managementInstitutional FrameworksRemedial Action PlansWater Governance

Identifiers

PMID34676112
PMCPMC8525309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.