Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34676079›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2021

Influence of handler relationships and experience on health parameters, glucocorticoid responses and behaviour of semi-captive Asian elephants.

J A H Crawley, O Liehrmann, D J Franco Dos Santos, J Brown, U K Nyein, H H Aung, W Htut, Z Min Oo, M W Seltmann, J L Webb and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

J A H CrawleyDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, 20014, Finland.
O LiehrmannDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, 20014, Finland.
D J Franco Dos SantosDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, 20014, Finland.
J BrownCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA.
U K NyeinMyanma Timber Enterprise, Yangon, 11011 Myanmar.
H H AungMyanma Timber Enterprise, Yangon, 11011 Myanmar.
W HtutMyanma Timber Enterprise, Yangon, 11011 Myanmar.
Z Min OoMyanma Timber Enterprise, Yangon, 11011 Myanmar.
M W SeltmannDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, 20014, Finland.
J L WebbSchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, 23 Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
M LahdenperäDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, 20521, Finland.
V LummaaDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, 20014, Finland.
University of Turku · FIMyanmar Timber Enterprise · MMSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute · USUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Declining wild populations combined with accumulating captive populations of e.g. livestock, pets, draught and zoo animals have resulted in some threatened species with substantial proportions of their populations in captivity. The interactions animals have with humans in captivity depend on handler familiarity and relationship quality and can affect animal health, growth and reproduction with consequences for the success of conservation programmes. However, assessments of how specific human-animal relationships affect a range of physiological and behavioural outcomes are rare. Here, we studied semi-captive Asian elephants with detailed records of elephant-handler (mahout) relationships and veterinary management, allowing assessment of multiple welfare indicators in relation to specific mahout-elephant relationship lengths and mahout experience. These included measures of physiological stress (faecal glucocorticoid metabolite [FGM], heterophil:lymphocyte ratio [H:L]), muscle damage (creatine kinase [CK]), immunological health (total white blood cell count [TWBC]) and behaviour (response to mahout verbal commands). We found no evidence that FGM or H:L related to aspects of the mahout-elephant relationship. Longer overall mahout experience (i.e. years of being a mahout) was linked to increased muscle damage and inflammation, but the lengths of specific mahout-elephant relationships were inversely associated with muscle damage in working-age elephants. Elephants responded more to familiar mahouts in behavioural tasks and faster to mahouts they had known for longer. In summary, our results found little evidence that the mahout-elephant relationship affects physiological stress in this population based on FGM and H:L, but mahout experience and relationships were linked to other physiological responses (CK, TWBC), and elephants require behavioural adjustment periods following mahout changes.

Indexed as

Animal welfareglucocorticoidshuman–animal interactionshuman–animal relationshipsmahoutphysiology

Identifiers

PMID34676079
PMCPMC8528106
OpenAlexW3121107609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.