ReviewFrontiers in plant science2021
Shaping the Organ: A Biologist Guide to Quantitative Models of Plant Morphogenesis.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auxin-cytokinin crosstalk and differential growth: complex relationships driving carpel initiation.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- AI-driven multiscale virtual plant cell modeling: from molecular mechanisms to tissue functions.Planta · 2026Review
- Advances in the use of morphogenic regulators and peptide regenerating factors for boosting plant transformation and genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Review
- Stiffness transitions in new walls post-cell division differ betweenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Optimization of Plant Growth Regulators for In Vitro Mass Propagation of a Disease-Free 'Shine Muscat' Grapevine Cultivar.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
- Computer models of cell polarity establishment in plants.Plant physiology · 2023Review
- Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review.Essays in biochemistry · 2022Article
- Genome-wide and molecular characterization of theFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organ morphogenesis is the process of shape acquisition initiated with a small reservoir of undifferentiated cells. In plants, morphogenesis is a complex endeavor that comprises a large number of interacting elements, including mechanical stimuli, biochemical signaling, and genetic prerequisites. Because of the large body of data being produced by modern laboratories, solving this complexity requires the application of computational techniques and analyses. In the last two decades, computational models combined with wet-lab experiments have advanced our understanding of plant organ morphogenesis. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the most important achievements in the field of computational plant morphodynamics. We present a brief history from the earliest attempts to describe plant forms using algorithmic pattern generation to the evolution of quantitative cell-based models fueled by increasing computational power. We then provide an overview of the most common types of "digital plant" paradigms, and demonstrate how models benefit from diverse techniques used to describe cell growth mechanics. Finally, we highlight the development of computational frameworks designed to resolve organ shape complexity through integration of mechanical, biochemical, and genetic cues into a quantitative standardized and user-friendly environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.