Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34675882›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2021

A New Clinical Model to Estimate the Pre-Test Probability of Cushing's Syndrome: The Cushing Score.

Mirko Parasiliti-Caprino, Fabio Bioletto, Tommaso Frigerio, Valentina D'Angelo, Filippo Ceccato, Francesco Ferraù, Rosario Ferrigno, Marianna Minnetti, Carla Scaroni, Salvatore Cannavò and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Cushing's disease across the lifespan: a case-based clinical review.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mirko Parasiliti-CaprinoEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Fabio BiolettoEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Tommaso FrigerioOncological Endocrinology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Valentina D'AngeloOncological Endocrinology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Filippo CeccatoEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine, DIMED, Hospital-University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Francesco FerraùDipartimento di Patologia Umana DETEV "G. Barresi", Università di Messina, UOC di Endocrinologia, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy.
Rosario FerrignoSezione di Endocrinologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Università Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Marianna MinnettiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Carla ScaroniEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine, DIMED, Hospital-University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Salvatore CannavòDipartimento di Patologia Umana DETEV "G. Barresi", Università di Messina, UOC di Endocrinologia, AOU Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy.
Rosario PivonelloSezione di Endocrinologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Università Federico II di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Andrea IsidoriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Fabio BroglioEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Roberta GiordanoDepartment of Biological and Clinical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Maurizio SpinelloNovartis Farma, Origgio, Italy.
Silvia GrottoliEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Emanuela ArvatOncological Endocrinology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Padua · ITNovartis (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypercortisolism accounts for relevant morbidity and mortality and is often a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. A prompt diagnosis is necessary to treat Cushing's syndrome as early as possible. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a clinical model for the estimation of pre-test probability of hypercortisolism in an at-risk population. Design: We conducted a retrospective multicenter case-control study, involving five Italian referral centers for Endocrinology (Turin, Messina, Naples, Padua and Rome). One hundred and fifty patients affected by Cushing's syndrome and 300 patients in which hypercortisolism was excluded were enrolled. All patients were evaluated, according to current guidelines, for the suspicion of hypercortisolism. Results: The Cushing score was built by multivariable logistic regression, considering all main features associated with a clinical suspicion of hypercortisolism as possible predictors. A stepwise backward selection algorithm was used (final model AUC=0.873), then an internal validation was performed through ten-fold cross-validation. Final estimation of the model performance showed an average AUC=0.841, thus reassuring about a small overfitting effect. The retrieved score was structured on a 17.5-point scale: low-risk class (score value: ≤5.5, probability of disease=0.8%); intermediate-low-risk class (score value: 6-8.5, probability of disease=2.7%); intermediate-high-risk class (score value: 9-11.5, probability of disease=18.5%) and finally, high-risk class (score value: ≥12, probability of disease=72.5%). Conclusions: We developed and internally validated a simple tool to determine pre-test probability of hypercortisolism, the Cushing score, that showed a remarkable predictive power for the discrimination between subjects with and without a final diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCushing SyndromeDiagnostic Techniques, EndocrineFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsadrenal diseaseadrenocorticotrophic hormonecorticosteroidscortisolhypercortisolismpituitary disease

Identifiers

PMID34675882
PMCPMC8524092
OpenAlexW3206685280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.